IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2021i1p49-d715537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factor Assessment, Sero-Prevalence, and Genotyping of the Virus That Causes Foot-and-Mouth Disease on Commercial Farms in Ethiopia from October 2018 to February 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Fanos Tadesse Woldemariyam

    (Laboratory of Host Pathogen Interaction, Department of Biosystems, Division of Animal and Human Health Engineering, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 34, Ethiopia
    National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center, Sebeta P.O. Box 04, Ethiopia)

  • Annebel De Vleeschauwer

    (Sciensano, Service for Exotic Viruses and Particular Diseases, 1180 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Nato Hundessa

    (National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center, Sebeta P.O. Box 04, Ethiopia)

  • Ayelech Muluneh

    (National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center, Sebeta P.O. Box 04, Ethiopia)

  • Daniel Gizaw

    (National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center, Sebeta P.O. Box 04, Ethiopia)

  • Susanne Tinel

    (Laboratory of Host Pathogen Interaction, Department of Biosystems, Division of Animal and Human Health Engineering, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Kris De Clercq

    (Sciensano, Service for Exotic Viruses and Particular Diseases, 1180 Brussels, Belgium)

  • David Lefebvre

    (Sciensano, Service for Exotic Viruses and Particular Diseases, 1180 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Jan Paeshuyse

    (Laboratory of Host Pathogen Interaction, Department of Biosystems, Division of Animal and Human Health Engineering, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

A cross-sectional serological, active outbreak search and a questionnaire-based survey were carried out to investigate foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) sero-epidemiology in Ethiopia. The circulating serotype of the FMD virus (FMDV) was identified, and the knowledge regarding FMD and husbandry practices was assessed. Using the questionnaire survey, a total of 237 individuals were interviewed, and the majority responded that there is no practice of reporting disease outbreak, free in and out movement of livestock, or share pastures, and they use traditional case management as a means of controlling the disease. A total of 1938 cattle, 490 domestic small ruminants, and 426 swine were sampled randomly for serological analysis using the 3ABC non-structural protein (NSP) enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. An overall prevalence of 25% in cattle, 5% in domestic small ruminants, and 2% in swine was recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that cattle from the Oromia, Tigray, and Amhara regions had the highest probability of being sero-positive as compared with Addis Ababa odds ratio(OR)(OR: 4 (95% confidence interval (CI)(CI [3–6], 3 (95% CI [2,5]), and 2 (95% CI 2 [1,3]), respectively)). Older cattle (older than three years) and domestic small ruminants (>18 months) had a higher chance of being seropositive (OR: 2, 95% CI [1.6,3]) and (OR: 6, 95% CI [2,18]), respectively). Female and older swine older than three years of age had a higher chance of being sero-positive ( p < 0.05). Local breed cattle had the lowest chance (OR: 0.2. 95% CI [0.1–0.3]) of being sero-positive. A region, age, and breed proved to have a statistically significant association with sero-positivity ( p < 0.05) in cattle. Swine from Bishoftu were less likely to test positive than swine from Addis Ababa (OR: 0.04, 95% CI [0.01–0.3]). From 96 herds, 72 pooled outbreak samples were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), virus isolation, serotyping (antigen enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)), sequencing, and phylogenetic tree analysis. Six serotype A (G-IV) FMD viruses and three serotype O east African (EA-3 and EA-4) FMDVs were identified. Thus, this study established the lack of disease outbreak reporting, poor husbandry problems, and the prevalence of FMD in three domestic species (cattle, small ruminant, and swine). In addition, continuous circulation of serotype A and O in the study area was confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanos Tadesse Woldemariyam & Annebel De Vleeschauwer & Nato Hundessa & Ayelech Muluneh & Daniel Gizaw & Susanne Tinel & Kris De Clercq & David Lefebvre & Jan Paeshuyse, 2021. "Risk Factor Assessment, Sero-Prevalence, and Genotyping of the Virus That Causes Foot-and-Mouth Disease on Commercial Farms in Ethiopia from October 2018 to February 2020," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:49-:d:715537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:49-:d:715537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.