IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2021i1p24-d711628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No-Antibiotic-Pectin-Based Treatment Differently Modified Cloaca Bacteriobiome of Male and Female Broiler Chickens

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana B. Lysko

    (Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Poultry Farming—Branch of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center”, 644555 Omsk, Russia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Olga A. Baturina

    (Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Natalia B. Naumova

    (Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia)

  • Nadezhda A. Lescheva

    (The Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Stolypin Omsk State Agrarian University, 644008 Omsk, Russia)

  • Valentina I. Pleshakova

    (The Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Stolypin Omsk State Agrarian University, 644008 Omsk, Russia)

  • Marsel R. Kabilov

    (Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia)

Abstract

As the information about the effect of pectin prebiotics on chicken gut microbiota is scarce, by using high throughput metagenomic sequencing with Illumina Miseq we examined the cloaca bacteriobiome of male and female chickens receiving antibiotic- or pectin-containing drinking water. The bacteriobiome was dominated by two phyla (Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) and three classes (Clostridia, Bacilli and Gammaproteobacteria), with the difference displayed by the relative abundance of 42 OTUs. At the level of the major dominant OTUs, prebiotic supplementation drastically increased Enterococcus abundance (from 0 to 11% and 23% in males and females, respectively). The better feed use efficiency and growth performance of the pectin-receiving chickens implied their better health and corroborated putative beneficial role of the altered bacteriobiome, although its ecophysiological and/or pathogenic importance could not be readily inferred. Notably, the gut microbiota response to antibiotics showed more sex-related differential OTUs as compared to the pectin prebiotic (19 vs. 4), suggesting different mechanisms of the studied supplementations in shaping the gut bacteriobiome in different sexes. Therefore, we recommend targeting sex as a separate factor in interventional studies to account for sex-specific peculiarities in the microbiome response and taking into account the male/female ratio of industrial flocks prior to choosing a production technology. The studied prebiotic (pectin) can be used in developing new pre/symbiotic preparations and supplementation regimes as alternatives to antibiotics for stimulating broiler chicken production.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana B. Lysko & Olga A. Baturina & Natalia B. Naumova & Nadezhda A. Lescheva & Valentina I. Pleshakova & Marsel R. Kabilov, 2021. "No-Antibiotic-Pectin-Based Treatment Differently Modified Cloaca Bacteriobiome of Male and Female Broiler Chickens," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:24-:d:711628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/24/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/24/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:24-:d:711628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.