IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2021i1p17-d710756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Basin-Scale Impacts of Cultivation Practices on Cotton Yield and Water Conservation under Various Hydroclimatic Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Lili Tan

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yingqi Zhang

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Gary W. Marek

    (USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX 79012, USA)

  • Srinivasulu Ale

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Vernon, Vernon, TX 76384, USA)

  • David K. Brauer

    (USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX 79012, USA)

  • Yong Chen

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

The SWAT model equipped with an improved auto-irrigation function was used to assess the impacts of cultivation practices on irrigated and dryland cotton yield and water conservation in the Texas Panhandle. Results showed the largest irrigation depth led to reductions in irrigation and crop evapotranspiration (ET c ) with slightly increased cotton yields compared to the baseline scenarios under different hydroclimatic regimes. However, soil water content and surface runoff values were increased when using the largest irrigation depth. The opposite results were observed for the small irrigation depth. Early planting of cotton resulted in decreased irrigation and ET c , and increased cotton yields under both irrigated and dryland conditions, particularly in normal and wet years. By contrast, the late planting scenarios indicated the opposite for those variables. Simulated hydrologic variables were relatively stable using various maturity cultivars. Nevertheless, greater than 10% reductions in irrigated cotton yield under diverse hydroclimatic years and dryland yields during normal and wet years were identified in the long-season cotton. The opposite was determined for the short-season cotton. These outcomes suggest that a larger irrigation depth, earlier planting date, and short-season cultivar are promising cultivation practices for improving cotton yield and water conservation in the Texas Panhandle.

Suggested Citation

  • Lili Tan & Yingqi Zhang & Gary W. Marek & Srinivasulu Ale & David K. Brauer & Yong Chen, 2021. "Modeling Basin-Scale Impacts of Cultivation Practices on Cotton Yield and Water Conservation under Various Hydroclimatic Regimes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-:d:710756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-:d:710756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.