IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i9p850-d629901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Feeding Pattern Traits and Its Relationship to Feed Efficiency and Production Traits in Duroc Pigs

Author

Listed:
  • Kier G. Santiago

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea
    Department of Animal Science, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz 3120, Philippines)

  • Sung-Hoon Kim

    (Pig Gene Korea Co., Ltd., Yongin 16866, Korea)

  • Bryan Irvine Lopez

    (Division of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea)

  • Dong-Hui Lee

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea)

  • Young-Gyu Cho

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea)

  • Yu-Na Song

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea)

  • Kang-Seok Seo

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea)

Abstract

This study was conducted to estimate the genetic parameters of different feeding pattern traits, including average daily feed intake (ADFI), average occupation time per day (AOTD), average occupation time per visit (AOTV), average daily feeding rate (ADFR), average feeding rate per feeding visit (AFRV), average feed intake per feeding visit (AFIV), and average number of visits per day (ANVD), and their genetic relationship to production traits, such as on-test average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), loin muscle area (LMA), lean percentage (LP), and feed efficiency traits, such as feed conversion ratio (FCR) and five measures of residual feed intake (RFI1 to RFI5), in Duroc pigs (DD). The non-heritable common spatial pen effect was also estimated in all studied traits. The feeding pattern traits used in this study were derived from filtered feeding visits of 602 DD pigs. Using three animal models and the REML method, the genetic parameters revealed low to moderate heritability for ADFI (0.19 to 0.32) and AFIV (0.18 to 0.33), moderate heritability for ANVD (0.28 to 0.35) and AOTV (0.21 to 0.31), and high heritability for AOTD (0.73), ADFR (0.62 to 0.64), and AFRV (0.59 to 0.63). The addition of a common spatial pen effect in models 2 and 3 had a substantial impact, ranging from 8% to 23%, on the total variability of most feeding pattern traits, with the exception of AOTD, which only had a percentage variance of 0.30% due to the pen effect. The genetic and phenotypic correlation revealed that ADFI had consistent moderate to high genetic and phenotypic correlation with production and feed efficiency (FE) traits. However, selection against ADFI would negatively affect on-test ADG. Interestingly, the AOTD had no genetic correlation with ADG (0.04), low to moderate positive genetic correlation with FCR (0.27) and all RFI measures (0.24 to 0.33), and moderate negative correlation with LP (−0.39), indicating that selection for DD pigs with lower AOTD would not influence on-test ADG but may increase LP and improve feed efficiency by lowering FCR and all RFI measures. However, the corresponding phenotypic correlation of AOTD with production and feed efficiency traits was mostly weak, which can be attributed to the low residual or environmental correlation between these correlated traits. At the genetic level, the feeding pattern traits showed potential in improving feed efficiency and production traits. However, further studies are needed to evaluate their impact at phenotypic level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kier G. Santiago & Sung-Hoon Kim & Bryan Irvine Lopez & Dong-Hui Lee & Young-Gyu Cho & Yu-Na Song & Kang-Seok Seo, 2021. "Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Feeding Pattern Traits and Its Relationship to Feed Efficiency and Production Traits in Duroc Pigs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:850-:d:629901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:850-:d:629901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.