IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i2p154-d498698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of Heavy Use Area Protection (HUAP) Pads in Poultry Farm

Author

Listed:
  • Gulnihal Ozbay

    (Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, DE 19901, USA)

  • Raju Khatiwada

    (Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, DE 19901, USA)

  • Stacy Smith

    (Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, DE 19901, USA)

  • Lathadevi Karuna Chintapenta

    (Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, DE 19901, USA
    Biology Department, University of Wisconsin River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA)

Abstract

This research focuses on the efficiency of recommended heavy use area protection (HUAP) pads installed in poultry houses utilizing the Choptank River, a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is severely affected by crop agriculture and poultry feeding operations. Water quality degradation along with scarcity of water is a significant concern in this area, suggesting a need for changes in both environmental and groundwater management practices. Our objective in this study was to compare the efficiency of HUAP in reducing litter spillage and nutrient runoff between two poultry houses, one of which was constructed in 2005 and the other in 2009. The poultry house constructed in 2005 did not have HUAP pads initially; they were built in 2006. The poultry house built in 2009 had the pads from the starting point. We collected soil and water samples each month and analyzed them for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), nitrate, nitrite, total nitrogen, phosphate, and other soil properties throughout the year. The pH of soil and water samples was in the range of 6.8–8.0 and 6.5–7.2, respectively. We collected six water samples in total in the ditch, from points at retention ponds near the farm ditch to sites in wooded areas on the farm. Water sample B (where ditch water meets retention pond water from the poultry farm) had the highest EC value and nitrate, nitrite, and total nitrogen concentrations compared with other water samples. The subsequent water samples downstream had reduced loads of nutrients. The study results suggest that there was a minimum carryover of nutrients from soil into the runoff water, storm ditches, and adjacent stream. There was also a minimal effect of house cleaning and storm events in raising the concentration of nutrients in soil and water samples at our study sites. The older poultry site had higher total nitrogen and phosphorous surrounding the pads, whereas no elevated levels of nutrients were identified at the newer site. The ability of HUAP pads to hold onto contaminates decreases with age and use. This study also shows that the impacts from poultry activities on surface and groundwater can be minimized by using management practices such as HUAP pads. These practices can reduce pollution in the farm, increase productivity, and save farmers and ranchers time and money in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulnihal Ozbay & Raju Khatiwada & Stacy Smith & Lathadevi Karuna Chintapenta, 2021. "Efficacy of Heavy Use Area Protection (HUAP) Pads in Poultry Farm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:154-:d:498698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozbay, Gulnihal & Khatiwada, Raju & Chintapenta, Lathadevi K. & Handy, Eunice F. & Smith, Stacy L., 2016. "Sustainable Farm Practice: Study of Total and Soluble Phosphorus in a Poultry Farm Equipped with Heavy Use Area Protection Pads, Dover, Delaware," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:154-:d:498698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.