IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i9p413-d415550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organic but Also Low-Input Conventional Farming Systems Support High Biodiversity of Weed Species in Winter Cereals

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Kleofas Berbeć

    (Department of Systems and Economics of Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland)

  • Mariola Staniak

    (Department of Forage Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland)

  • Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk

    (Department of Systems and Economics of Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland)

  • Anna Kocira

    (State School of Higher Education in Chełm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Pocztowa 54, 22-100 Chełm, Poland)

  • Jarosław Stalenga

    (Department of Systems and Economics of Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland)

Abstract

In recent years, the European Union has been paying particular attention to the problem of biodiversity loss. The possibilities of its assessment and conservation are included in the latest European Union (EU) policies and reflected in the European Biodiversity Strategy. The biodiversity of weeds in winter cereals in organic and conventional low-input farms in Eastern Poland was investigated during a 3-year period. Significantly more species and larger abundance were found in organic than in conventional farming systems. The biodiversity of these communities was described by Shannon’s diversity and Simpson’s dominance indices, which showed diversity to be well maintained in both farming systems; however, significantly higher Shannon’s index and significantly lower Simpson’s index values were observed in organic farms. Both farming systems were the mainstay of endangered and rare species, as well as some invasive weed species. Weed communities of organic farms were dominated mostly by Setaria pumila and Elymus repens , while conventional farms were dominated by Juncus bufonius and Setaria pumila . The study showed the importance of organic farming systems for biodiversity conservation. It was also shown that low-input (traditional) conventional farms are also beneficial for biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Kleofas Berbeć & Mariola Staniak & Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk & Anna Kocira & Jarosław Stalenga, 2020. "Organic but Also Low-Input Conventional Farming Systems Support High Biodiversity of Weed Species in Winter Cereals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:413-:d:415550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Schumacher & Simon Ohnmacht & Ronja Rosenstein & Roland Gerhards, 2018. "How Management Factors Influence Weed Communities of Cereals, Their Diversity and Endangered Weed Species in Central Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak, 2021. "Weed Ecology and New Approaches for Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luděk Tyšer & Michaela Kolářová & Ondřej Tulačka & Pavel Hamouz, 2021. "Weed vegetation in conventional and organic farming in West Bohemia (Czech Republic)," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 376-382.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:413-:d:415550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.