IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i9p386-d407836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nitrogen Contents in Soil, Grains, and Straw of Hybrid Rice Differ When Applied with Different Organic Nitrogen Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Amanullah

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

  • Hidayat Ullah

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

  • Mohamed Soliman Elshikh

    (Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mona S. Alwahibi

    (Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jawaher Alkahtani

    (Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Asim Muhammad

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

  • Shah Khalid

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

  • Imran

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan)

Abstract

In the rice–wheat (R–W) system, inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilizer (urea, etc.) is the largest component of the N cycle, because the supply of N from organic fertilizers is insufficient. But the 4% Initiative aims to improve organic matter and stimulate carbon sequestration in soils using best agronomic practices (sustainable management practices) which are economically, environmentally, and socially friendly. This research project was, therefore, designed to assess the impact of various organic sources (OS, animal manure versus plant residues), inorganic N (urea), and their different combinations on the N concentrations in soils and plants (i.e., grains and straw) of hybrid rice plants. The experiments were conducted on farmers’ fields in Batkhela (Malakand), northwestern Pakistan, over 2 years (2011–2012 (Y1) and 2012–2013 (Y2)). The results revealed that N concentrations in soil as well as in rice plants ranked first when applied with urea-N, followed by the application of N in mixture (urea + OS), while the control plots (no N applied) ranked at the bottom. Among the six OS (three animal manures: poultry, sheep, and cattle; and three crop residues: onion, berseem, and wheat), application of N in the form of poultry manure was superior in terms of higher N concentrations in both soil and plants. Applying the required total N (120 kg N ha −1 ) in the form of 75% N from urea +25% N from OS resulted in higher N concentrations in soil and plants in Y1. The required total N (120 kg N ha −1 ) application in the form of 50% N from urea +50% N from OS produced higher N concentrations in soil and plants in Y2. It was concluded from the results, that combined application of N sources in the form of urea + OS can produce good performances in terms of higher N concentrations in soil as well as in rice plants under the R–W system. Integrated use of urea (N-fertilizer) with organic carbon sources (animal manures and crop residue) could sustain rice-based (exhaustive) cropping system.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanullah & Hidayat Ullah & Mohamed Soliman Elshikh & Mona S. Alwahibi & Jawaher Alkahtani & Asim Muhammad & Shah Khalid & Imran, 2020. "Nitrogen Contents in Soil, Grains, and Straw of Hybrid Rice Differ When Applied with Different Organic Nitrogen Sources," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:386-:d:407836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:386-:d:407836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.