IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i6p230-d371834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Lange

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Livestock Systems, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Maria Gentz

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Livestock Systems, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Michael Hahne

    (Clinic for Swine, Small Ruminants and Forensic Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany)

  • Christian Lambertz

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Matthias Gauly

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Onno Burfeind

    (Chamber of Agriculture of Schleswig-Holstein, Gutshof 1, 24327 Blekendorf, Germany)

  • Imke Traulsen

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Livestock Systems, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how farrowing and rearing systems affect skin lesions, serum cortisol, and aggressive behavior as indicators for weaning stress of piglets. Between May 2016 and March 2018, in total 3144 weaning piglets from three different farrowing systems were examined: farrowing crates (FC), single-housing free-farrowing pens (FF), and group-housing of lactating sows and litters (GH). After weaning and regrouping, piglets were relocated to conventional rearing pens (conv; 5.7 m 2 ) or to wean-to-finish pens (w-f; 12.4 m 2 ). Skin lesions were scored 24 h after weaning. Blood samples were taken one week before and 24 h after weaning to analyze the individual difference in serum cortisol. Behavior was observed for 24 h after relocation. Animals raised in FC and FF had significantly more skin lesions than that of GH animals. Piglets born in GH showed lower cortisol differences and fought less and for shorter periods compared to FC and FF piglets. Piglets weaned to w-f pens showed greater cortisol changes and fought significantly longer than piglets in conv pens. Group housing during the suckling period reduced weaning stress for piglets in terms of skin lesions, serum cortisol, and aggressive behavior. Greater space allowance (w-f vs. conv) was not beneficial with regard to the investigated parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Lange & Maria Gentz & Michael Hahne & Christian Lambertz & Matthias Gauly & Onno Burfeind & Imke Traulsen, 2020. "Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:230-:d:371834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Gentz & Anita Lange & Sebastian Zeidler & Christian Lambertz & Matthias Gauly & Onno Burfeind & Imke Traulsen, 2020. "Tail Lesions and Losses of Docked and Undocked Pigs in Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:230-:d:371834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.