IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i5p145-d353028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Different Working and Tool Parameters on Performance of Several Types of Cultivators

Author

Listed:
  • Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Masoud Fazeli

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Ali Roshanianfard

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • José Luis Hernández-Hernández

    (Division of Research and Graduate Studies, TecNM/Technological Institute of Chilpancingo, Chilpancingo 39070, Mexico)

  • Alejandro Fuentes Penna

    (TecNM/CIIDET, Querétaro 76000, Mexico)

  • Israel Herrera-Miranda

    (Government and Public Management Faculty, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Chilpancingo 39087, Mexico)

Abstract

In this study, the effects of tillage depth, forward speed and soil moisture content during the cultivator operation on the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance were investigated using five types of cultivators. The experiments were performed in the factorial design based on the randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in loamy sand soil. Different soil moisture contents (factor A) from 5 to 16% for dry soils and 17 to 35% for wet soils, forward speed of tractor (factor B) at four levels of 1.16, 1.61, 1.97, and 3.82 km/hand working depth (factor C) at two levels of 10 and 20 cm were selected. The analysis of variance results showed that the main effects on the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance were significant. With increasing the forward speed, working depth, and blade width, the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance significantly increased. As the soil moisture content increased, the amount of draft force decreased. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement are related to the crescent cultivator and the lowest ones to the cultivator with a sweep blade. The maximum amounts of draft force and energy requirement at the speed of 3.82 km/h were 296.702 N and 0.03708 MJ in the dry conditions, respectively. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement are related to the crescent cultivator and the lowest ones to the cultivator with a sweep blade. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement in dry soil at 10–20 cm depth were 313.534 N and 0.039204 MJ, respectively, and the lowest values were 189 N and 0.019512 MJ in wet soil at the depth of 0–10 cm, respectively. The highest mean value of the area obtained from the profiles was 254.62 cm 2 related to the dry conditions and forward speed of 3.82 km/h, and the lowest mean value of the area obtained in the wet conditions was 199.6 cm 2 at the forward speed of 1.16 km/h. The highest average area obtained from the profiles was observed in the dry conditions for C4 as 434.813 cm 2 and the lowest one was 57.94 cm 2 in the wet conditions for the cultivator with a chisel blade and L-shaped shank. The highest average area created by cultivators at the 10–20 cm depth in the dry conditions was 332.875 cm 2 and the lowest one at the 0–10 cm depth in the wet conditions was 123.55 cm 2 . The results of this study can help the designers and manufacturers of agricultural machinery to effectively design and manufacture the machinery with optimum draft and energy requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh & Masoud Fazeli & Ali Roshanianfard & José Luis Hernández-Hernández & Alejandro Fuentes Penna & Israel Herrera-Miranda, 2020. "Effect of Different Working and Tool Parameters on Performance of Several Types of Cultivators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:145-:d:353028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Hashaam & Muhammad Waqar Akram & Moaz Ahmad & Muhammad Zuhaib Akram & Muhammad Faheem & Muhammad Maqsood & Muhammad Aleem, 2023. "3D finite element analysis of tine cultivator and soil deformation," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 107-117.
    2. Petru Cardei & Nicolae Constantin & Vergil Muraru & Catalin Persu & Raluca Sfiru & Nicolae-Valentin Vladut & Nicoleta Ungureanu & Mihai Matache & Cornelia Muraru-Ionel & Oana-Diana Cristea & Evelin-An, 2023. "The Random Vibrations of the Active Body of the Cultivators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Hongbo Zhao & Yuxiang Huang & Zhengdao Liu & Wenzheng Liu & Zhiqi Zheng, 2021. "Applications of Discrete Element Method in the Research of Agricultural Machinery: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Sher Ali Shaikh & Yaoming Li & Ma Zheng & Farman Ali Chandio & Fiaz Ahmad & Mazhar Hussain Tunio & Irfan Abbas, 2021. "Effect of Grouser Height on the Tractive Performance of Single Grouser Shoe under Different Soil Moisture Contents in Clay Loam Terrain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:145-:d:353028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.