IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i8p372-d2006183.html

Metricized Scaffolds: AI-Enabled Simulation Training and Transfer in Human Resource Development

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Xie

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong)

  • Yujun Liu

    (Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong)

  • Yuanyuan Wang

    (Management and Strategy, Lee Shau Kee School of Business and Administration, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, 30 Good Shepherd Street, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Yiduo Wang

    (Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong)

Abstract

AI-enabled simulation platforms are increasingly used for talent development, offering scalable, low-risk practice and algorithmic feedback for interpersonal HR capabilities such as difficult conversations, negotiation, and consultation. Yet HRD evaluation cautions that within-platform improvement may not transfer to authentic interactions once dashboards and metrics disappear. We conceptualize AI-enabled simulation training as metricized scaffolding and integrate scaffolding theory with exploration–exploitation learning dynamics to explain when algorithmic supports fade into self-regulation rather than produce metric adaptation (score chasing). We introduce Algorithmic Feedback Literacy (AFL)—learners’ capability to interpret algorithmic feedback, calibrate its authority, and translate cues into portable self-scaffolds—as a mechanism linking metricized practice to transfer. We test this model in an AI-enabled virtual internship and career development program that combines repeated simulation attempts with an authentic consultation assessment. Using platform traces (592 attempts nested within 90 learners), instructor-rated consultation performance as a transfer outcome, and 102 learner reflections, we examine how distributed practice span and practice dose related to simulation gains and transfer, and how consultation complexity changes, which interactional behaviors predicted success. Distributed practice span predicted transfer beyond within-platform gains, while practice dose operated primarily through measurable simulation improvement. Complexity shifted performance relevance toward governance and boundary-setting behaviors. Qualitative evidence identified two developmental pathways: productive internalization, where learners converted metric cues into routines and mode-switching strategies, and metric adaptation, where learners optimized scores without internalizing broader professional judgment. We discuss design implications for AI-enabled HRD and retention-oriented capability building: cultivate AFL through transparency and calibration supports, design for deliberate fading, and pair metricized refinement with authentic assessments to strengthen transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Xie & Yujun Liu & Yuanyuan Wang & Yiduo Wang, 2026. "Metricized Scaffolds: AI-Enabled Simulation Training and Transfer in Human Resource Development," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:8:p:372-:d:2006183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/8/372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/8/372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:8:p:372-:d:2006183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.