IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i8p361-d1999775.html

The Toxic Dynamics of Perceived Leader Favoritism: How Jealousy and Malicious Envy Drive Counterproductive Work Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim A. Elshaer

    (Department of Management, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 380, Saudi Arabia)

  • Chokri Kooli

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
    Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada)

  • Alaa M. S. Azazz

    (Department of Social Studies, Arts College, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 380, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sameh Fayyad

    (Hotel Management Department, Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

  • Yahia Zakaria Aly

    (Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, King Salman International University, Sharm El Sheikh 8761250, Egypt
    Hospitality Management Department, Egyptian Higher Institute for Tourism and Hotels, Cairo 4471350, Egypt)

  • Hani Alshaiti

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 380, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The research investigates the psychopathological mechanisms through which perceived leader favoritism (PLF) can affect counterproductive work behavior (CWB) through the mediating effects of employee jealousy toward their coworkers and the specialized form of envy known as malicious envy. Integrating Social Comparison Theory with Affective Events Theory, the study proposes that perceived favoritism triggers unfavorable social comparisons, which in turn evoke negative emotional states that manifest in dysfunctional workplace behaviors. The research used a quantitative study design to gather information from 436 employees working in hotels. The researchers used structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze the research data while they also conducted reliability and validity assessments. The study shows that perceived leader favoritism leads to higher organizational counterproductive work behavior (CWB-O) and higher interpersonal counterproductive work behavior (CWB-I) among employees. The study found that PLF leads to higher employee jealousy levels which result in higher malicious envy levels that drive CWB behavior. The research found that jealousy and malicious envy function as central psychological pathways which connect favoritism to workplace deviance. This study offers a new contribution to the existing body of knowledge about leadership by extending its scope to investigate how subtle favoritism practices lead to harmful results while explaining the emotional mechanisms which cause counterproductive behavior. The research develops an integrated framework which helps people comprehend how perceived leader favoritism affects emotional responses and behavioral patterns within modern workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Chokri Kooli & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Sameh Fayyad & Yahia Zakaria Aly & Hani Alshaiti, 2026. "The Toxic Dynamics of Perceived Leader Favoritism: How Jealousy and Malicious Envy Drive Counterproductive Work Behavior," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:8:p:361-:d:1999775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/8/361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/8/361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:8:p:361-:d:1999775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.