Author
Listed:
- Gladys L. Peña Pazos
(Academic Department of Humanities, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Piura 20001, Peru)
- Marina Fernández Miranda
(Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, School of Language and Literature, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
- Elberth E. García Panta
(Faculty of Accounting and Financial Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
- Adolfo Zeta Vite
(Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
- Milagros Córdova de Chang
(Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, School of Language and Literature, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
- José H. Chang Valdiviezo
(Faculty of Engineering and Mining, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
- Juan F. Gonzales Vera
(Faculty of Administration, Universidad César Vallejo, Piura 20001, Peru)
- Adolfo A. Jurado Rosas
(Faculty of Accounting and Financial Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura 20002, Peru)
Abstract
This study analyzes the transition toward anticipatory public administration through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the growing deployment of predictive models, a clear research gap remains regarding the socio-technical prerequisites—such as institutional trust, data infrastructure, and ethical–legal frameworks—that condition their success. To address this, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, retrieving 68 open-access articles published between 2020 and 2025 from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Data synthesis was performed using descriptive bibliometric mapping and qualitative thematic analysis. The results show that scientific interest has experienced accelerated growth since 2024, highlighting a preference for machine learning systems that automate service delivery. While AI enables significant benefits, including a 40% reduction in budgetary errors and early fraud detection, progress is hindered by algorithmic opacity (“black box” models), the risk of structural bias, and civil servants’ confirmation bias. The study concludes that technological complexity must be subordinated to democratic safeguards. To this end, a research agenda is proposed alongside practical implications, recommending that public institutions implement mandatory independent algorithmic audits, enforce strict interpretability standards in public procurement, and adopt hybrid regulatory frameworks to ensure fair and accountable governance.
Suggested Citation
Gladys L. Peña Pazos & Marina Fernández Miranda & Elberth E. García Panta & Adolfo Zeta Vite & Milagros Córdova de Chang & José H. Chang Valdiviezo & Juan F. Gonzales Vera & Adolfo A. Jurado Rosas, 2026.
"Anticipatory Governance and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Mapping and Research Agenda for Public Administration,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:7:p:326-:d:1985736
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:7:p:326-:d:1985736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.