IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i7p320-d1982605.html

The Transformative Impact of Blockchain on Accounting Systems Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review of Data Integrity, Decentralization, and Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Gamboa-Cruzado

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Erik Loayza-Zarate

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima 15086, Peru)

  • Gerson Loayza-Leon

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima 15086, Peru)

  • Grover Mejia Osorio

    (Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Javier Rojas Villanueva

    (Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Edgar Vicente Armas

    (Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Angel Nuñez Meza

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión, Pasco 19001, Peru)

  • Alex Salazar-Marzal

    (Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15081, Peru)

Abstract

Digital transformation has increased interest in the use of blockchain in Accounting Systems Auditing because of its potential to strengthen data integrity, decentralized validation, traceability, and accountability. However, the available evidence remains fragmented across technical, theoretical, methodological, and bibliometric dimensions. This study systematically analyzes the literature on blockchain and its influence on Accounting Systems Auditing, focusing on effectiveness criteria, auditing indicators, journal quartiles, definitions, theoretical foundations, thematic patterns, and keyword co-occurrence. A systematic literature review was conducted following the Kitchenham approach and the PRISMA guideline, covering studies published between 2019 and August 2025. From 5031 initial records, 63 studies were retained after applying exclusion criteria and quality assessment. The findings show that blockchain effectiveness is mainly evaluated through data integrity and decentralization, while scientific production is concentrated in Q1 and Q2 journals. The literature remains strongly oriented toward technical and operational foundations, with limited integration of broader theoretical frameworks. Thematic analysis identifies tokenization and governance as motor themes, while blockchain, auditing, and accounting constitute the most influential semantic nodes. This review contributes by integrating conceptual, theoretical, methodological, metric, and bibliometric dimensions into a single framework, offering a clearer understanding of how blockchain may transform audit evidence, internal control, assurance quality, fraud risk, accountability, and auditor judgment. The field shows high scientific visibility but still requires stronger theoretical integration, evaluative standardization, and empirical validation in real-world auditing contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Gamboa-Cruzado & Erik Loayza-Zarate & Gerson Loayza-Leon & Grover Mejia Osorio & Javier Rojas Villanueva & Edgar Vicente Armas & Angel Nuñez Meza & Alex Salazar-Marzal, 2026. "The Transformative Impact of Blockchain on Accounting Systems Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review of Data Integrity, Decentralization, and Accountability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-46, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:7:p:320-:d:1982605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/7/320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/7/320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:7:p:320-:d:1982605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.