IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i6p282-d1965967.html

Accounting for Knowledge: A Critical Review of How Management Accounting Shapes the Governance of Intellectual Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Vânia Dias

    (School of Management, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Patrícia Quesado

    (CICF—Research Center on Accounting and Taxation, School of Management, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Lurdes Silva

    (CICF—Research Center on Accounting and Taxation, School of Management, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Helena Costa Oliveira

    (Centre for Organisational and Social Studies of the Polytechnic Institute of Porto (CEOS.PP), Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study critically investigates the scientific literature on the intersection of management accounting and intellectual capital using a bibliometric performance analysis and science-mapping approach. Drawing on a sample of 59 publications from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, the paper maps the intellectual structure, key contributors, and thematic evolution of the field. This study conceptualizes management accounting not merely as a neutral technical system but as a socio-political mechanism that shapes how intellectual capital is rendered visible, measurable, and governable within organizations. The findings identify five dominant research clusters (intellectual capital and corporate strategy, management accounting and performance, green intellectual capital, digitalization and value creation, and management control and intangibles), revealing how accounting practices actively participate in constructing organizational realities and legitimizing particular forms of value and knowledge. The analysis highlights that measurement and reporting practices privilege certain dimensions of intellectual capital while potentially obscuring others, raising critical questions about power, visibility, and accountability in knowledge-based economies. In particular, the growing emphasis on digitalization and sustainability reflects shifting governance regimes in which accounting systems extend their influence over organizational conduct and strategic decision-making. By integrating bibliometric techniques with a critical interpretive lens, this study contributes to the literature by reframing management accounting as a key site where knowledge, control, and organizational value are negotiated. It also identifies gaps for future research, particularly regarding the ethical and political implications of accounting for intangible resources in increasingly digital and transparency-driven environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Vânia Dias & Patrícia Quesado & Lurdes Silva & Helena Costa Oliveira, 2026. "Accounting for Knowledge: A Critical Review of How Management Accounting Shapes the Governance of Intellectual Capital," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:282-:d:1965967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/6/282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/6/282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:282-:d:1965967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.