Author
Listed:
- Nemanja Kašiković
(Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)
- Sandra Dedijer
(Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)
- Željko Zeljković
(Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)
- Dragana Glušac
(Technical Faculty “Mihailo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, 23000 Zrenjanin, Serbia)
- Velibor Premčevski
(Technical Faculty “Mihailo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, 23000 Zrenjanin, Serbia)
- Aleksandar S. Anđelković
(Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)
- Nemanja Tasić
(Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)
Abstract
In contemporary organizations, digital learning environments and AI-supported instructional modalities play an increasingly important role in workforce upskilling and operational efficiency. Despite growing investments in video-based learning and AI-generated instructional agents, empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains inconclusive. This study examines whether different digital learning modalities influence skill acquisition, task performance, retention, and user perceptions in a simulated work-related context. An experimental study was conducted with 65 participants assigned to one of three learning conditions: static instructional material, video-based instruction with human narration, and video-based instruction with an AI-generated avatar. Performance was assessed through a pretest–posttest design, a practical task simulating a typical data-processing activity, and a delayed retention test after seven days. Participants also evaluated the learning experience in terms of clarity, engagement, and overall effectiveness. The results revealed no statistically significant differences between instructional modalities in knowledge acquisition, task performance, or retention. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were observed in participants’ self-reported ratings. However, qualitative findings suggested that some participants perceived the AI-generated avatar as somewhat distracting, despite generally positive evaluations of the video-based formats. These findings did not provide evidence that more technologically advanced and resource-intensive learning formats led to superior performance outcomes in the present sample. The findings highlight the importance of instructional design quality over technological complexity and point to a potential mismatch between user preferences and actual performance. From a management perspective, the results raise relevant questions regarding the cost-effectiveness of AI-supported learning solutions and provide evidence-based insights for decision-making in organizational learning and digital transformation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Nemanja Kašiković & Sandra Dedijer & Željko Zeljković & Dragana Glušac & Velibor Premčevski & Aleksandar S. Anđelković & Nemanja Tasić, 2026.
"Evaluating the Effectiveness of AI-Supported Digital Training: Implications for Organizational Learning and Decision-Making,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:246-:d:1949848
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:246-:d:1949848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.