Author
Listed:
- Carlos Santiago-Torner
(REDEES Research Group, Faculty of Economics and Business, International University of La Rioja (UNIR), 26006 LogroƱo, Spain)
Abstract
Introduction: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into recruitment and selection is reshaping how organizations identify, evaluate, and choose talent. Although prior research emphasizes improvements in efficiency and automated decision-making, concerns related to fairness, transparency, trust, and applicant experience remain insufficiently resolved. Despite increasing scholarly attention, the field continues to evolve in a fragmented manner. This scoping review addresses this gap by systematically mapping and synthesizing the literature on the advantages and challenges of AI-based recruitment and selection, considering both organizational outcomes and human implications. Materials and Methods: A scoping review was conducted following established methodological frameworks. A structured search and screening process across major academic databases resulted in a final corpus of 33 peer-reviewed studies. The analysis combined descriptive mapping with a hybrid thematic synthesis organized around five dimensions: efficiency and decision support, bias and fairness, transparency and trust, applicant experience, and governance and ethics. Results: The evidence indicates that AI-based recruitment enhances efficiency, scalability, and consistency in decision processes. At the same time, these benefits are accompanied by challenges related to algorithmic bias, limited interpretability, reduced trust, and concerns about procedural fairness. The findings highlight a persistent interdependence between performance outcomes and legitimacy-related responses. Conclusions: This review proposes a socio-technical framework that explains AI-based recruitment as a system shaped by the interaction between technological design, human judgment, and governance structures. The results underscore the importance of integrating oversight, transparency, and ethical accountability to support responsible and sustainable implementation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:5:p:232-:d:1945059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.