Author
Listed:
- Luciane Dutra Oliveira
(Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering and Systems, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Gabriel Sperandio Milan
(Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering and Systems, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- André Gobbi Farina
(Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering and Systems, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Miriam Borchardt
(Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering and Systems, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
Abstract
Experimental Governance (EG) has emerged as a strategic framework for managing complexity in high-uncertainty environments. However, its application in the private sector remains fragmented, often conflated with purely operational tools. This study addresses this gap by performing a conceptual transfer of EG principles into the domain of business processes. Through an expanded Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 41 peer-reviewed articles (covering the period 2004–2026), we identify what we term the ‘Internalization Paradox’: while firms rapidly adopt experimental methodologies like Agile or Lean, they often fail to embed them into formal governance structures that ensure long-term accountability and institutional learning. This updated review incorporates cutting-edge discussions on Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance, experimentalist metagovernance, and the strategic regulation of uncertainty. Our findings suggest that organizational resilience is not merely a byproduct of technological readiness, but an emergence of ‘Institutionalized Experimentalism’. We propose a Conceptual Framework that operationalizes EG through iterative feedback loops, corporate sandboxes, and adaptive decision rights, providing a robust roadmap for future empirical research in management and organizational theory.
Suggested Citation
Luciane Dutra Oliveira & Gabriel Sperandio Milan & André Gobbi Farina & Miriam Borchardt, 2026.
"Experimental Governance: Insights into Its Application in Business Processes and Future Research Directions,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:162-:d:1902658
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:162-:d:1902658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.