IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i3p113-d1872843.html

Generative Artificial Intelligence in HRM Practice: Patterns, Profiles, and Theoretical Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Melão

    (CISeD–Research Center in Digital Services, School of Technology and Management of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3500-100 Viseu, Portugal)

  • João Reis

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Although Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has the potential to transform Human Resource Management (HRM), empirical research on its actual use is still rare. This study aims to investigate how HR professionals use GenAI in HRM, the benefits and challenges they associate with it, and how these patterns vary with organizational context. An exploratory cross-sectional survey of 150 HR professionals in the UK ( n = 70) and the US ( n = 80) was conducted to investigate usage patterns. Results show that GenAI is mainly applied in job analysis and design, training and development, and recruitment and selection, but concerns persist around operational and technical difficulties, privacy and ethics, output accuracy, and employee resistance. Cluster analysis revealed four user profiles that represent different ways of reconciling efficiency gains and risks. Viewed through the lens of Diffusion of Innovation, Technology–Organization–Environment, and Task–Technology Fit, the results highlight ethical and legal compatibility as a relevant condition for sustained use, point to the potential importance of the organization’s GenAI governance environment, and reveal a boundary condition when tasks involve consequential decisions. This study provides insights into early patterns of GenAI use in HRM and advances theory with propositions that can guide future confirmatory research on responsible and effective use.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Melão & João Reis, 2026. "Generative Artificial Intelligence in HRM Practice: Patterns, Profiles, and Theoretical Insights," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:113-:d:1872843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/3/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/3/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:113-:d:1872843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.