Author
Listed:
- Beatriz Acosta-Uribe
(Business Administration, University of Papaloapan, Tuxtepec 68301, Mexico)
- Ariadna Crisantema Martínez-Hernández
(Department of Organizational Studies, Division of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Guanajuato, Guanajuato 36250, Mexico)
- Emilio Sánchez-Santa-Bárbara
(Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Labor Relations and Human Resources, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Nancy Guzmán-Raya
(Department of Organization and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain)
Abstract
In recent decades, profound transformations in work organization, employment conditions, and organizational change processes have intensified workers’ exposure to psychosocial risks, with significant consequences for occupational health and well-being. Despite the growing relevance of these risks, organizations often lack psychometrically robust instruments capable of capturing psychosocial stressors associated with change, Conflicts, and working conditions in an integrated manner. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a questionnaire designed to measure psychosocial factors related to organizational changes, interpersonal Conflicts, and occupational well-being. An instrumental study design was employed, following international standards for the construction and validation of psychological instruments. The sample consisted of 350 workers with a mean age of 33.19 years (SD = 9.18; range: 18–66) and an average organizational tenure of 6.71 years (SD = 8.61). The initial 48-item questionnaire was refined to a final version comprising 24 items distributed across 7 scales: Organizational Changes, Work Program, Job Security, Promotion, Training, Interpersonal Conflicts, and Lack of Participation. Preliminary analyses indicated that the data adequately met the assumptions for factor analysis (KMO = 0.81; Bartlett’s test χ 2 = 4376.98, p < 0.001). The results supported a seven-factor structure explaining 72% of the total variance, with clear and interpretable factor loadings consistent with the theoretical model. Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent across scales (α = 0.72–0.91; ω = 0.84–0.95), including short scales with three items. Inter-scale correlations were low to moderate, supporting discriminant validity and indicating that the dimensions, while related, represent distinct constructs. Overall, the findings provide strong evidence for the instrument’s reliability and validity based on its internal structure, supporting its use for psychosocial risk assessment and research on organizational changes, interpersonal Conflicts, and occupational well-being.
Suggested Citation
Beatriz Acosta-Uribe & Ariadna Crisantema Martínez-Hernández & Emilio Sánchez-Santa-Bárbara & Nancy Guzmán-Raya, 2026.
"Development and Validation of a Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Factors Related to Organizational Changes and Occupational Stress,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:111-:d:1872790
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:111-:d:1872790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.