IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v16y2026i2p64-d1849610.html

Unfolding the Relationship Between Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Commitment in Private Higher Education Institutions in Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Wael Elshanhaby

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Commerce, University of Buraimi, Al Buraimi 512, Oman
    Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, Port Said University, Port Said 42511, Egypt)

  • Najlaa Ahmed

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Commerce, University of Buraimi, Al Buraimi 512, Oman
    Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

  • Amr Noureldin

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Administrative and Human Sciences, Buraydah Colleges, Buraydah 51418, Saudi Arabia)

  • Moustafa Leila

    (Department of Human Resources Management, College of Commerce, University of Buraimi, Al Buraimi 512, Oman)

  • Ibrahim Abdelmutalib

    (Department of Human Resources Management, Faculty of Administrative and Human Sciences, Buraydah Colleges, Buraydah 51418, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Aboueldahab

    (Department of Management and Business Technology, Faculty of Management Technology & Information Systems, Port Said University, Port Said 42511, Egypt)

  • Ahmed Attiea

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

Abstract

This study examines how psychological safety (PS) relates to employees’ innovation commitment (IC) in private higher education institutions (HEIs) in Egypt by specifying a learning-based mechanism and two enabling boundary conditions. Drawing on organizational learning theory and commitment research, we surveyed 405 academic and administrative staff (faculty members, teaching assistants, and administrators) across six private universities using validated multi-item measures and analyzed the proposed moderated-mediation model using PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 4), alongside procedural checks to mitigate common method bias. Results indicate that psychological safety is positively associated with knowledge sharing (KS) and innovation commitment, and that knowledge sharing partially mediates the relationship between psychological safety and innovation commitment. The findings further show that transformational leadership (TL) strengthens the positive association between psychological safety and knowledge sharing, while digital readiness (DR) strengthens the positive association between knowledge sharing and innovation commitment. The study contributes by clarifying when psychologically safe climates are most likely to be linked to innovation commitment through day-to-day exchange behaviors and by identifying leadership and digital capability conditions that amplify these relationships in private HEIs. Practically, the results underscore the value of institutionalizing psychologically safe dialog, developing transformational leadership behaviors, and investing in digital infrastructure and skills to make knowledge flows more actionable for innovation-related persistence.

Suggested Citation

  • Wael Elshanhaby & Najlaa Ahmed & Amr Noureldin & Moustafa Leila & Ibrahim Abdelmutalib & Mohamed Aboueldahab & Ahmed Attiea, 2026. "Unfolding the Relationship Between Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Commitment in Private Higher Education Institutions in Egypt," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:64-:d:1849610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/2/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/2/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:64-:d:1849610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.