Author
Listed:
- Nelson Lay-Raby
(Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2520461, Chile)
- Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia
(Escuela de Ingeniería Comercial, Departamento de Ingeniería Comercial, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaiso 2390123, Chile)
- Nicolás Contreras-Barraza
(Escuela de Comercio, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 2340025, Chile)
Abstract
This study examines how organizational models are evolving beyond post-Fordism in the context of digitalization, platformization, and new forms of labor governance. Using a bibliometric analysis of 1573 Web of Science publications, the article maps the intellectual genealogy, disciplinary foundations, and global collaborative patterns of research on the platform economy. The field has consolidated around three core concepts—platform economy, gig economy, and sharing economy—anchored in clusters focused on business models, labor precarity, and regulatory and governance debates. The analysis reveals a temporal shift from early narratives centered on sharing and collaborative consumption to contemporary concerns with algorithmic management, precarious work, and worker resistance. Parallel discussions of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 expose tensions between human-centered aspirations and the continued expansion of platform capitalism. The global landscape shows both vitality and asymmetry: China leads in empirical output, while the USA and England dominate theoretical agenda-setting and international collaboration. Overall, the findings demonstrate that platform research constitutes a mature, interdisciplinary field bridging labor sociology and management studies. The study calls for stronger integration of Global South perspectives and further examination of whether human-centered organizational visions can meaningfully counteract the structural inequalities embedded in platform-mediated work.
Suggested Citation
Nelson Lay-Raby & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza, 2025.
"Beyond Post-Fordism: Organizational Models, Digital Transformation, and the Future of Work,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-29, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:13-:d:1828153
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:13-:d:1828153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.