Author
Listed:
- Luoyanzi Lin
(School of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150006, China)
- Jiehua Lv
(School of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150006, China)
Abstract
Current research on evaluating tourism’s ecological efficiency using multi-source data fusion and graph neural networks has notable limitations. At the data level, integrating diverse sources is difficult due to differences in format, quality, and meaning. Data cleaning and preprocessing can lead to information loss, and relying on a single source often fails to reflect the complexity of tourism ecosystems. At the model level, traditional methods struggle to identify unreliable data and lack scientific rigor in handling expected and unexpected outcomes. These issues reduce the accuracy and practical value of evaluation results. This paper introduces a new method for assessing tourism’s ecological efficiency based on multi-source data fusion and graph neural networks. First, we integrate tourism statistics, environmental monitoring, and socio-economic data into a comprehensive dataset. Then, we apply a graph neural network (GNN) model to uncover hidden relationships and patterns, enabling a more accurate assessment of tourism’s environmental impact. The method also analyzes how tourism’s ecological efficiency varies across time and regions. We validate the method through case studies of representative tourist destinations and discuss its application in tourism planning. Regression analysis based on a single data source yields a 2020 tourism ecological efficiency score of 72. In contrast, using multi-source data fusion and GNN, the score rises to 85—an improvement of 13 points. This study offers a new approach to evaluating tourism’s ecological efficiency, enhances our understanding of tourism ecosystems, and supports sustainable tourism development.
Suggested Citation
Luoyanzi Lin & Jiehua Lv, 2025.
"Tourism Ecological Efficiency Assessment Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion and Graph Neural Network,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:334-:d:1733701
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:334-:d:1733701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.