IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i8p308-d1718563.html

Trusting Humans or Bots? Examining Trust Transfer and Algorithm Aversion in China’s E-Government Services

Author

Listed:
  • Yifan Song

    (Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan)

  • Takashi Natori

    (Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan)

  • Xintao Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 211189, China)

Abstract

Despite the increasing integration of government chatbots (GCs) into digital public service delivery, their real-world effectiveness remains limited. Drawing on the literature on algorithm aversion, trust-transfer theory, and perceived risk theory, this study investigates how the type of service agent (human vs. GCs) influences citizens’ trust of e-government services (TOE) and e-government service adoption intention (EGA). Furthermore, it explores whether the effect of trust of government (TOG) on TOE differs across agent types, and whether perceived risk (PR) serves as a boundary condition in this trust-transfer process. An online scenario-based experiment was conducted with a sample of 318 Chinese citizens. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal that, within the Chinese e-government context, citizens perceive higher risk (PR) and report lower adoption intention (EGA) when interacting with GCs compared to human agents—an indication of algorithm aversion. However, high levels of TOG mitigate this aversion by enhancing TOE. Importantly, PR moderates the strength of this trust-transfer effect, serving as a critical boundary condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifan Song & Takashi Natori & Xintao Yu, 2025. "Trusting Humans or Bots? Examining Trust Transfer and Algorithm Aversion in China’s E-Government Services," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:308-:d:1718563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peyton, Kyle, 2020. "Does Trust in Government Increase Support for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 596-602, May.
    2. Abdelhalim, Esraa & Anazodo, Kemi Salawu & Gali, Nazha & Robson, Karen, 2024. "A framework of diversity, equity, and inclusion safeguards for chatbots," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 487-498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busemeyer, Marius R., 2021. "Health care attitudes and institutional trust during the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from the case of Germany," Working Papers 01, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    2. Cui, Yuanyuan (Gina) & van Esch, Patrick & Phelan, Steven, 2024. "How to build a competitive advantage for your brand using generative AI," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 583-594.
    3. Cohn, Alain & Jessen, Lasse J. & Klašnja, Marko & Smeets, Paul, 2023. "Wealthy Americans and redistribution: The role of fairness preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    4. Yamagishi, Atsushi, 2020. "School bullying is positively associated with support for redistribution in adulthood," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Hashmi, Nada & Bal, Anjali S., 2024. "Generative AI in higher education and beyond," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 607-614.
    6. Fehr, Dietmar & Müller, Daniel & Preuss, Marcel, 2024. "Social mobility perceptions and inequality acceptance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 366-384.
    7. Kishishita, Daiki & Yamagishi, Atsushi & Matsumoto, Tomoko, 2023. "Overconfidence, income-ability gap, and preferences for income equality," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2021. "Understanding Tax Policy: How do People Reason?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(4), pages 2309-2369.
    9. Osadchaya, Elena & Marder, Ben & Yule, Jennifer A. & Yau, Amy & Lavertu, Laura & Stylos, Nikolaos & Oliver, Sebastian & Angell, Rob & Regt, Anouk de & Gao, Liyu & Qi, Kang & Zhang, Will Zhiyuan & Zhan, 2024. "To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: Navigating the paradoxes of generative AI in the advertising industry," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 571-581.
    10. Clem Brooks & Elijah Harter, 2021. "Redistribution Preferences, Inequality Information, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning in the United States," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Campomanes, Ignacio P., 2024. "The political economy of inequality, mobility and redistribution," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Urbani, Roberto & Ferreira, Caitlin & Lam, Joey, 2024. "Managerial framework for evaluating AI chatbot integration: Bridging organizational readiness and technological challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 595-606.
    13. Retkowsky, Jana & Hafermalz, Ella & Huysman, Marleen, 2024. "Managing a ChatGPT-empowered workforce: Understanding its affordances and side effects," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 511-523.
    14. Bonnet, Julien & Ciani, Emanuele & Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David, 2025. "What explains preferences for redistribution? Evidence from an international survey," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Brewer, Jordan & Patel, Dhru & Kim, Dennie & Murray, Alex, 2024. "Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the integration of artificial intelligence and blockchain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 525-535.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:308-:d:1718563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.