IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i8p306-d1718477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pioneering Public Sector Innovation: The Case of Greece’s e-Government Team

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasios Pantazis Deligiannis

    (School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 574 00 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Vassilios Peristeras

    (School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 574 00 Thessaloniki, Greece
    General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), 1048 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

This study offers the first systematic exploration of the Greek e-Government team, a public sector innovation unit that operated within the Office of the Prime Minister of Greece from 2009 to 2012—the sole example of such a unit in the country. It illustrates how strategically positioned innovation units can function as change agents within government bureaucracies. The purpose of this work was to analyze how this distinctive unit functioned by bridging policy formulation, legislative drafting, and technological implementation at the highest government levels. The research involved thematic analysis of original interviews conducted with most core members of the team. The findings highlight successes, notably the Diavgeia transparency platform, which markedly improved administrative transparency, accountability, and citizen access to government decisions. Important challenges were also identified, particularly regarding the sustainability of the unit, issues of institutionalization, and meaningful citizen engagement. The experience of the Greek e-Government team suggests that public sector innovation (PSI) units are most effective when they combine high-level political access with multidisciplinary expertise and operational flexibility. The analysis also reveals inherent tensions between the need for centralized coordination and the benefits of decentralized implementation, as well as challenges in maintaining citizen participation throughout the policy development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasios Pantazis Deligiannis & Vassilios Peristeras, 2025. "Pioneering Public Sector Innovation: The Case of Greece’s e-Government Team," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:306-:d:1718477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Foray, 2018. "Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy—a case study on the emergence of new policy practices," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 817-832.
    2. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember & Piret Tõnurist, 2020. "Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1652-1673, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    5. Javier Barbero & Olga Diukanova & Carlo Gianelle & Simone Salotti & Artur Santoalha, 2022. "Economic modelling to evaluate Smart Specialisation: an analysis of research and innovation targets in Southern Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 1496-1509, September.
    6. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:450-468 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Gianluca Pallante & Emanuele Russo & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states," Working Papers hal-04097530, HAL.
    8. Mert Abay & Sedef Akgüngör, 2024. "Technological paths and smart specialization: analysis of regional entry and exit in Turkey," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 45-84, March.
    9. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-437, June.
    10. Chen, Kaihua & Xue, Zehua & Guo, Rui & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "The holistic role of multi-level government in transformative innovation process: Theoretical framework and evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Ilaria Giada Anversa & Gianmarco Cantafio & Pasquale Pizzimenti, 2019. "Local Clusters as “Building Blocks” for Smart Specialization Strategies: A Dynamic SWOT Analysis Application in the Case of San Diego (US)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 180.
    13. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kinne, Jan & Krüger, Miriam, 2021. "The strength of weak and strong ties in bridging geographic and cognitive distances," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-049, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Olimpia Fontana & Simone Vannuccini, 2024. "How to Institutionalise European Industrial Policy (for Strategic Autonomy and the Green Transition)," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Hassan Arouri & Adel Ben Youssef & Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2020. "Drivers of growth in Tunisia: young firms vs incumbents," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 323-340, January.
    16. Javier Barberoa & Olga Diukanovaa & Carlo Gianellea & Simone Salottia & Artur Santoalha, 2020. "Economic modelling to evaluate Smart Specialisation: an analysis on research and innovation targets in Southern Europe," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20200525, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    17. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    18. Ethan Gifford & Maureen McKelvey, 2019. "Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and S3: Conceptualizing Strategies for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. George Martinidis & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Stanisław Minta & Rafał Ramut, 2022. "Intellectual Capital and Sustainable S3 in the Regions of Central Macedonia and Western Macedonia, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Zhang, Luxin, 2025. "Influence of cultural heritage protection on high-quality economic development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    21. Jessica Birkholz, 2022. "Transforming Regional Knowledge Bases: A Network and Machine Learning Approach to Link Entrepreneurial Experimentation and Regional Absorptive Capacity," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2205, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:306-:d:1718477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.