IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i8p294-d1710919.html

Influencing Beauty Perceptions: Role of TikTok Influencer Information Adoption in Shaping Consumer Views of Cosmetic Product Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ben Arbia

    (Laboratoire ERMA, Department of Marketing, Institut des Hautes Études Commerciales de Sousse, Université de Sousse, Sousse 4054, Tunisia)

  • Myriam Ertz

    (LaboNFC, Chaire TDS, Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada)

  • Aws Horrich

    (LaboNFC, Chaire TDS, Department of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada)

  • Olfa Bouzaabia

    (Laboratoire ERMA, Department of Marketing, Institut des Hautes Études Commerciales de Sousse, Université de Sousse, Sousse 4054, Tunisia)

Abstract

This research examines how influencer information spreads and is accepted by consumers, focusing on a Tunisian sample of social media users, and how these effects percolate into consumers’ perception of the quality of cosmetic products. Drawing on the Information Adoption Model (IAM), this study develops a conceptual framework adapted to the social media landscape, particularly the TikTok platform. To test this framework, we conducted a survey targeting 285 consumers using a non-random sampling frame, primarily through Facebook and Instagram. The findings suggest that consumers perceive influencer information as useful when they believe it is credible and of high quality. Interestingly, while high-quality information tends to lead to influencer information adoption, credibility alone does not guarantee adoption. Additionally, our study emphasizes the role of influencer information usefulness in driving its adoption. One notable discovery is the link between influencer information adoption and consumers’ perceptions of the quality of cosmetic products. However, this correlation does not hold equally for both genders, thus suggesting a moderation effect between gender and influencer information processing in this context.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ben Arbia & Myriam Ertz & Aws Horrich & Olfa Bouzaabia, 2025. "Influencing Beauty Perceptions: Role of TikTok Influencer Information Adoption in Shaping Consumer Views of Cosmetic Product Quality," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:294-:d:1710919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/8/294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang Xiao & Linyong Luo & Tongping Ke, 2024. "The influence of eWOM information structures on consumers’ purchase intentions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1713-1735, September.
    2. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Jinsoo Park & Hamirahanim Abdul Rahman & Jihae Suh & Hazami Hussin, 2019. "A Study of Integrative Bargaining Model with Argumentation-Based Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Bo Yang & Chao Liu & Xusen Cheng & Xi Ma, 2022. "Understanding Users' Group Behavioral Decisions About Sharing Articles in Social Media: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 819-842, August.
    5. Un-Kon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Confirmation of Nation Brand Image in International Tourism Advertisement on Travel Intention of Foreign Tourists: The Case of Korean ITA for Chinese Tourists," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    6. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    7. Kyoungmin Lee & Minsung Kim & Sohyun Yoon & Jin-young Kim, 2025. "Use of central bank digital currency in the travel context," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 449-476, June.
    8. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    9. Zehra Ece Serman & Julian Sims, 2023. "Source Credibility Theory: SME Hospitality Sector Blog Posting During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2317-2334, December.
    10. Pei-Chu, Hung, 2019. "Understanding What Drives Consumers to Use Gourmet Apps: Applying a Relationship Quality Perspective," GATR Journals jmmr210, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Un-Kon Lee, 2017. "International Tourism Advertisements on Social Media: Impact of Argument Quality and Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Pham Minh & Dang Thao Yen & Ngo Thi Huong Quynh & Hoang Thi Hong Yen & Tran Thi Thanh Nga & Nguyen Van Quoc, 2021. "Assessment of influencer’s effects on customers’ online purchasing behavior in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(2), pages 81-96.
    13. Sunyoung Hlee & Hanna Lee & Chulmo Koo, 2018. "Hospitality and Tourism Online Review Research: A Systematic Analysis and Heuristic-Systematic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    14. repec:jtr:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:12-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Wang, Hui-Chih & Doong, Her-Sen, 2010. "Argument form and spokesperson type: The recommendation strategy of virtual salespersons," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 493-501.
    16. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    17. Haris Krijestorac & Rajiv Garg & Prabhudev Konana, 2021. "Decisions Under the Illusion of Objectivity: Digital Embeddedness and B2B Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2232-2251, July.
    18. Tsai-Ling Liu & Tyrone T. Lin & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2022. "Continuance Usage Intention toward E-Payment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Financial Sustainable Development Perspective Using Perceived Usefulness and Electronic Word of Mouth as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Stephanie Watts & Laurie Giddens, 2017. "Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1356608-135, January.
    20. Lingxin Min & Zhiyuan Yu, 2025. "Intergenerational Information-Sharing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: From Protective Action Decision Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    21. Keyi Li & Liang Rui, 2025. "The impact of short-form videos on tourist travel intention toward cities: an integrated theory of planned behavior and elaboration likelihood model approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:294-:d:1710919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.