IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i7p255-d1691046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengths, Gaps, and Challenges in the Decision-Making Processes in the Design of the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Joyce

    (Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia)

  • Gemma Carey

    (Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Fiona Buick

    (School of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra 2600, Australia)

Abstract

This study examines the decision-making processes that were used in the development of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). It draws on research that highlights that decision-making can be improved if organisations follow specific decision-making processes. This study sought to examine whether formal decision-making rules and processes were used in the development of the NDIS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 58 senior public servants between 2016 and 2021 in the Commonwealth government departments that had policy oversight and responsibility for both the design and implementation of the NDIS. The data showed that there were examples of data-driven decisions and risk analysis used, but also considerable gaps in decision-making processes. These gaps potentially resulted in poorer decision-making quality, which may have negatively impacted the design of the NDIS and could potentially explain some of the current problems with the scheme. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research to improve decision-making processes within public administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Joyce & Gemma Carey & Fiona Buick, 2025. "Strengths, Gaps, and Challenges in the Decision-Making Processes in the Design of the National Disability Insurance Scheme, Australia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:255-:d:1691046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/7/255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/7/255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:255-:d:1691046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.