Author
Listed:
- Nasser Alshawaaf
(Faculty of Business Studies, Arab Open University–Kuwait Branch, Al-Ardiya Industrial Area, P.O. Box 3322, Al-Safat 13033, Kuwait)
- Basil Alzougool
(Faculty of Business Studies, Arab Open University–Kuwait Branch, Al-Ardiya Industrial Area, P.O. Box 3322, Al-Safat 13033, Kuwait)
Abstract
Digital transformation in government services represents a strategic shift that leverages digital technologies to enhance efficiency, accessibility, convenience, and user-centricity. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments accelerated the digitisation of services to support remote access and social distancing. Governments typically progress from digitisation (converting physical processes into digital formats) to digitalisation (automating service delivery and improving process efficiency), and ultimately to full digital transformation, where services are completed instantly and entirely online. However, varying levels of maturity across countries influence service outcomes differently, and indicators related to service quality, convenience, and security remain underexamined, particularly in developing contexts. This study addresses these gaps by examining Kuwait’s progress along the digitalisation–digital transformation continuum. It investigates current trends and user preferences in the use of digital government services based on empirical quantitative data collected from users in Kuwait. Specifically, the research objectives are fourfold: (i) to identify crucial outcome metrics for the success of digital government services, (ii) to assess user evaluations of these services according to these metrics, (iii) to examine significant differences between digital transformation and digitalisation services, and (iv) to develop and empirically test a model for evaluating digital transformation success. Drawing on established Information Systems’ (ISs’) success perspectives, a customised conceptual model incorporating six outcome metrics in three domains—service-related (user satisfaction, service quality), convenience-related (accessibility, ease of use), and security-related (perceived security, perceived trust)—was developed. A survey of 378 users of digital government services in Kuwait was conducted to compare perceptions across service types using independent-samples t -tests and linear regression analyses. The study found that users primarily accessed government services through smartphones and dedicated applications, highlighting the importance of mobile optimisation, and showed a clear preference for real-time, fully automated services over those requiring extended approval processes. The results indicate that digital transformation services significantly outperform digitalisation services across five outcome metrics—satisfaction, service quality, accessibility, ease of use, and perceived security—while trust remains consistent across both. These findings underscore the importance of advancing comprehensive digital transformation to enhance public service delivery. Practical recommendations are provided to support Kuwait’s digital government strategy. Given the purposive sampling and cross-sectional, comparative design, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and future studies are encouraged to apply probability-based sampling and more advanced multivariate techniques (e.g., structural equation modelling) to validate and extend the proposed model.
Suggested Citation
Nasser Alshawaaf & Basil Alzougool, 2025.
"Assessing Digital Transformation Success in Kuwaiti Government Services,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:498-:d:1819692
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:498-:d:1819692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.