Author
Listed:
- Montserrat Peñarroya-Farell
(La Salle’s Smart Society Research Group, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)
- Maryam Vaziri
(La Salle’s Smart Society Research Group, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)
- Sasha Katalina Soto Rivera
(La Salle’s Smart Society Research Group, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)
- Francesc Miralles
(La Salle’s Smart Society Research Group, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)
Abstract
Although Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is one of the strategic choices for digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), its adoption remains constrained by leadership decision-making that must balance strategic aspirations with resource limitations and organizational inertia. Organizational leadership must face the dynamic and complex characteristics of digital transformation in the knowledge era. Drawing on Complexity Theory and integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Temporal Motivation Theory (TMT), and the Resource-Based View (RBV), this study proposes a conceptual framework reflecting distinct strategic leadership orientations. Following a qualitative approach based on semi-structured interviews with SME leaders and an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) this conceptual framework contributes by reframing GenAI adoption as a complex, nonlinear process rather than a straightforward diffusion model, that includes four strategic profiles (Strategic Adopters, Aspiring Adopters, Opportunistic Adopters, and Operational Stabilizers) that affect a dynamic relationship between three key adoption dimensions: intention, motivation, and resource allocation. SME leaders can benefit from a delimitation of their strategic and operational goals while overcoming adoption barriers.
Suggested Citation
Montserrat Peñarroya-Farell & Maryam Vaziri & Sasha Katalina Soto Rivera & Francesc Miralles, 2025.
"A Complex Leadership Perspective on Generative AI Adoption in SMEs: The Interplay of TAM, TMT, and RBV,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:494-:d:1818978
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:494-:d:1818978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.