IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i10p382-d1760621.html

Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Individual Actors of the Quintuple Helix Model and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Erika Loučanová

    (Department of Marketing, Trade and World Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Miriam Olšiaková

    (Department of Marketing, Trade and World Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Zuzana Štofková

    (Department of Economics, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Florin Cornel Dumiter

    (Department of Economics and Technical Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Engineering and Informatics, “Vasile Goldiș” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania)

Abstract

The article evaluates the relationships between the individual actors of the Quintuple Helix model and sustainability across EU countries. The model is based on the idea that innovation arises from the collaboration of five key subsystems: government, industry (economy), academia, civil society, and natural capital. Various studies have been conducted to assess the development of the EU’s sustainability goals based on the Triple Helix approach from different perspectives and from the view of the Quintuple Helix. However, we see a gap in the research in that key aspects of the success of these models in the EU have not been examined in terms of their mutual relationships. Therefore, this paper focuses on examining Quintuple Helix systems in the EU, eco-innovation, and sustainability using cluster and correlation analysis. Based on the results, we can infer that Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, and Luxembourg are among the leading EU countries in applying the Quintuple Helix model and promoting sustainability through collaborative innovation processes. The most significant contributions to sustainability within this model come primarily from ecological innovations, intellectual capital, and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika Loučanová & Miriam Olšiaková & Zuzana Štofková & Florin Cornel Dumiter, 2025. "Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Individual Actors of the Quintuple Helix Model and Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:382-:d:1760621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/10/382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/10/382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaveh Asiaei & Neale G O'Connor & Omid Barani & Mahesh Joshi, 2023. "Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 369-386, January.
    2. Elias Carayannis & Pantelis Kostis & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2024. "Quality Function Deployment-Oriented Strategic Outlook to Sustainable Energy Policies Based on Quintuple Innovation Helix," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6761-6779, June.
    3. Ida Grundel & Margareta Dahlström, 2016. "A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(4), pages 963-983, December.
    4. Rallou Taratori & Paulina Rodriguez-Fiscal & Marie Abigail Pacho & Sesil Koutra & Montserrat Pareja-Eastaway & Dimitrios Thomas, 2021. "Unveiling the Evolution of Innovation Ecosystems: An Analysis of Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Helix Model Innovation Systems in European Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xu & Wang, Pengmian & Xu, Qiuxiang, 2024. "Corporate environmental governance under the coordination of fiscal and financial policies: The case of green credit subsidy policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Christoph Friedrich & Daniel Feser, 2024. "Combining knowledge bases for small wins in peripheral regions. An analysis of the role of innovation intermediaries in sustainability transitions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(2), pages 211-236, June.
    4. Thomas Siderius & Trevor Zink, 2023. "Markets and the Future of the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1569-1595, September.
    5. Maruccia, Ylenia & Solazzo, Gianluca & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2020. "Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Martin, Hanna & Martin, Roman & Zukauskaite, Elena, 2018. "The Multiple Roles of Demand in Regional Development A Conceptual Analysis," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Wang, Shaofeng & Zhang, Hao, 2024. "Green entrepreneurship success in the age of generative artificial intelligence: The interplay of technology adoption, knowledge management, and government support," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Ariful Islam & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2023. "Configuring a Quadruple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM) Based Blueprint for Malaysian SMEs to Survivethe Covid-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(1), pages 102-127.
    9. Marko Lovec & Luka Juvančič, 2021. "The Role of Industrial Revival in Untapping the Bioeconomy’s Potential in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Friedrich, Christoph & Feser, Daniel, 2021. "Combining knowledge bases for system innovation in regions: Insights from an East German case study," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 430, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    11. Jorge Serrano-Malebrán & Carlos Molina & Fernando Garzón-Lasso & Sandra Arenas-Arango & Oscar Ortiz-Regalado, 2026. "Green human resource practices and sustainable advantage: evidence from the Chilean mining sector," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Abbas, Jawad, 2024. "Does the nexus of corporate social responsibility and green dynamic capabilities drive firms toward green technological innovation? The moderating role of green transformational leadership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Ma, Jinghao & Shang, Yujie & Liu, Liming, 2025. "Green image, digital transformation, and corporate green innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Weiss, Gerhard & Hansen, Eric & Ludvig, Alice & Nybakk, Erlend & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Simon Ndicu & Dianah Ngui & Laura Barasa, 2024. "Technological Catch-Up, Innovation, and Productivity Analysis of National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries in Africa 2010–2018," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7941-7967, June.
    16. Guimei Yang & Feng Liu & Putthiwat Singhdong, 2024. "Exploring the Impacts of Green Supply Chain Integration and Ambidextrous Green Innovation on the Financial Performance of China’s Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Akimowicz, Mikaël & Del Corso, Jean-Pierre & Gallai, Nicola & Képhaliacos, Charilaos, 2022. "The leader, the keeper, and the follower? A legitimacy perspective on the governance of varietal innovation systems for climate changes adaptation. The case of sunflower hybrids in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Muhammad Noman Yaseen & Aqsa Iqbal & Iftikhar Mehboob & Maooz Rafay & Muhammad Rafiq & Ifra Riaz & Asad Qayoom, 2023. "The Meditating Role Of Intellectual Capital Between Innovation, Corporate Governance And Firm Performance Of The Smes Of Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 89-93.
    19. Jhon Pinedo-López & Rubén Baena-Navarro & Yulieth Carriazo-Regino & Francisco Torres-Hoyos & Deybys Nieves-Garces, 2025. "Science, technology, and innovation policy and regional scientific production in Colombia: a methodological framework to address asymmetries in developing countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Ai, Hongshan & Tan, Xiaoqing & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Emrouznejad, Ali & Liu, Fan & Song, Malin, 2025. "Renewable energy transition and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:382-:d:1760621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.