IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/for/ijafaa/y2011i21p30-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting Your Forecasting and Planning Fundamentals Right: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alec Finney
  • Martin Joseph
  • Hannah Kurth

Abstract

In our previous issue (Winter 2011), Alec Finney and Martin Joseph advised readers on how to fine-tune a company’s forecasting and planning fundamentals. They recommended a three-step audit to focus on: • How good do we think we are? • In reality, how good are we? • How good should we strive to become? This new article illustrates how the audit process plays out within an organization. It provides two accounts based on a case study of a global biotechnology specialty-care group based in Paris, France. Alec and Martin’s story presents the auditors’ viewpoint. It describes the way the audit and subsequent analysis probed beneath the surface to reveal not only consensus views but polarized and outlying views. Hannah’s story is the internal view at the company, describing the challenges faced, how the interviews were received, and how the recommendations were presented to management. She concludes with an assessment of the benefits that accrued. Copyright International Institute of Forecasters, 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Alec Finney & Martin Joseph & Hannah Kurth, 2011. "Getting Your Forecasting and Planning Fundamentals Right: A Case Study," Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, International Institute of Forecasters, vol. 0(21), pages 30-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2011:i:21:p:30-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight.forecasters.org/shop/
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kahn, Kenneth B., 2014. "Solving the problems of new product forecasting," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 607-615.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:for:ijafaa:y:2011:i:21:p:30-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Pam Stroud). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iiforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.