IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/foj/journl/y2016i1p48-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is Game Studies Anyway? Legitimacy of Game Studies Beyond Ludo-centrism vs. Narrato-centrism Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Tulia Maria CĂȘVEAN

    (University of Bucharest)

Abstract

A decade after the technology allowed the “domestication” of video games and after their full integration into the everyday life and practice of large audience, the fascination exerted by interactivity and the digital revolution of the early 2000s led to the emergence of new academic collocations, known as game studies (Aarseth, 2001) or video game theory (Wolf & Peron, 2003).

Suggested Citation

  • Tulia Maria CĂȘVEAN, 2016. "What is Game Studies Anyway? Legitimacy of Game Studies Beyond Ludo-centrism vs. Narrato-centrism Debate," Revista Romana de Jurnalism si Comunicare - Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii, issue 1, pages 48-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2016:i:1:p:48-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/download_en.php?id_articol=153
    Download Restriction: Download is limited to active subscribers. Subscription information available at: http://jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/subscribe_en.php
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Video games; game studies; cultural studies; ludology; narratology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2016:i:1:p:48-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Raluca Radu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.