IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/foj/journl/y2014i1-2p55-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discursive Legitimation of Profit and Social Benefit in Annual Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia CMECIU

    () (“Danubius” University of Galaţi)

Abstract

Within the context of different environmental catastrophes and social protests against oil corporations, the annual reports of the organizations belonging to the oil industry reveal significant insights into the ways in which their CEOs, through letters to shareholders, provide a discursive shift from a profit benefit to a social benefit. Letters to shareholders, placed at the beginning of annual reports, have a twofold function: to provide audited information about the organizational financial performance and to persuade shareholders that their investments are worthwhile due to the organization’s focus on social and environmental issues. This paper will provide a comparative qualitative analysis of the letters to shareholders issued by Chevron and Petrom in their annual reports (2009- 2012). Starting from Teun A. van Dijk’s integrated socio-cognitive analysis of ideologies, I will identify the discursive categories used to legitimate the US and Romanian oil companies’ activities to defend the public interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia CMECIU, 2014. "Discursive Legitimation of Profit and Social Benefit in Annual Reports," Revista Romana de Jurnalism si Comunicare - Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii, issue 1-2, pages 55-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2014:i:1-2:p:55-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/download_en.php?id_articol=118
    Download Restriction: Download is limited to active subscribers. Subscription information available at: http://jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/subscribe_en.php

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Oil companies; ideology of power; ideology of struggle;

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2014:i:1-2:p:55-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.