IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Public Understanding of Science: Science PR and Popular Culture

Listed author(s):
  • Mircea SAVA


    (University of Bucharest)

Registered author(s):

    The present social context has imposed on science an active communication behavior with the wide audience. The process of science communication has a strong stake of Public Relations as its foundation. It can be stated that the science communication activities have become instruments of a science promotion platform, and the paradigm of Public Relations and Popular Culture served as its model for development. Creating and maintaining a positive attitude of various audiences towards science and the scientific research process is the main purpose followed through science communication. The means appealed to in order to build the science popularization products are made available by the mechanisms of popular culture, which allow wrapping the scientific information in a proper shape for consumption. The Public Understanding of Science (PUS) movement emphasize the clear orientation of science communication towards a vision in the logic of Public Relations on the field of popular culture. The perspective of science communication as public participation and involvement draws upon a model of dialogue and public engagement of science communication, which is built in the same way as the perspective of the Public Relations upon communication. The creator of popular science can be a scientist, or an organization dedicated to scientific research, both instances exploiting the logic of popular culture in order to build cultural products for science popularization

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Download is limited to active subscribers. Subscription information available at:

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii in its journal Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication.

    Volume (Year): (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 5-13

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2011:i:1:p:5-13
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania

    Order Information: Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies
    Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2011:i:1:p:5-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.