A Debate and Three Articles – A Comparative Analysis
The present research presents a quantitative-qualitative method, realized with the purpose of underlining in an objective manner the degree of the authors’ critical attitudes in the three articles, which appeared in the local press from Timisoara (Romania), about a debate on the Education Law’s Draft, in which the Minister of specialty took part. The research has also led to the discovery of a surprising fact.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies|
Web: http://www.jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2010:i:2:p:9-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.