IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ideology as Wound: AReading of Cristian Mungiu’s 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days

Listed author(s):
  • John DIXON

    (University of Lincoln)

  • Catherine REDPATH


    (University of Lincoln)

Registered author(s):

    Traumatic experience is as old as human experience, but since the ‘terror attacks’, cultural theorists have begun to problematise the nature of trauma itself. “Trauma” in psychoanalysis, refers to the violent creation of a traumatic wound, and the uncontrollable, repetitive effects of that wound. The traumatised subject is condemned to repeatedly attempt to express and articulate the traumatic event in a vain effort to attain psychic catharsis. It is widely argued that this trauma cannot be articulated in language, thus psychological catharsis can never be attained. This paper will argue diametrically against the construction of such psychoanalytic discourses surrounding trauma. We suggest that articulation of trauma in a cultural artefact such as film, may be presented and represented in the codification of the physical body. We will illustrate this with a reading of Cristian Mungiu’s award winning 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days which associates the suffering of the physical body with the traumatic historical experience of the Romanian people under Ceausescu’s regime. This paper asserts that the cultural industries have a responsibility to tell, testify, and remind the body politic of the past. Received knowledge about trauma decrees that trauma cannot be articulated, we however, will argue that the body politic is expressed through the focalisation of the physical body thereby rendering the silence audible.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Download is limited to active subscribers. Subscription information available at:

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii in its journal Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication.

    Volume (Year): (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 49-56

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:49-56
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania

    Order Information: Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies
    Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:49-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.