IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fma/fmanag/elliottvannessswalkerwarr06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Drives the S&P 500 Inclusion Effect? An Analytical Source

Author

Listed:
  • William Elliott
  • Bonnie Van Ness
  • Mark Walker
  • Richard Warr

Abstract

We present an analytical survey of the explanations—price pressure, downward-sloping demand curves, improved liquidity, improved operating performance, and increased investor awareness—for the increase in stock value associated with inclusion in the S&P 500 Index. We find that increased investor awareness is the primary factor behind the cross-section ofabnormal announcement returns. We also find some evidence of temporary price pressure around the inclusion date. We find no evidence that long-run downward-sloping demand curves for stocks, anticipated improvements in operating performance, or increased liquidity are related to the cross-section of announcement or inclusion returns.

Suggested Citation

  • William Elliott & Bonnie Van Ness & Mark Walker & Richard Warr, 2006. "What Drives the S&P 500 Inclusion Effect? An Analytical Source," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 35(4), Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:elliottvannessswalkerwarr06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Honghui Chen & Vijay Singal & Robert F. Whitelaw, 2015. "Comovement Revisited," NBER Working Papers 21281, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Alexis Cellier & Pierre Chollet & Souad Lajili Jarjir, 2013. "New empirical evidence on market reactions to changes in Socially Responsible Investment indexes," Post-Print hal-01367120, HAL.
    3. Danbolt, Jo & Hirst, Ian & Jones, Edward, 2018. "Gaming the FTSE 100 index," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 364-378.
    4. Lysle Boller & Fiona Scott Morton, 2020. "Testing the Theory of Common Stock Ownership," NBER Working Papers 27515, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Tor‐Erik Bakke & Hamed Mahmudi & Ashley Newton, 2020. "Performance peer groups in CEO compensation contracts," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 997-1027, December.
    6. Hongfei Tang & Kangzhen Xie & Xiaoqing Eleanor Xu, 2022. "Real estate as a new equity market sector: Market responses and return comovement," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(2), pages 431-467, June.
    7. Ernest N. Biktimirov & Yuanbin Xu, 2019. "Asymmetric stock price and investor awareness reactions to changes in the Nasdaq 100 index," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 134-145, March.
    8. repec:ibf:ijbfre:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:81-92 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Loice Koskei, 2017. "The Effect of Foreign Portfolio Equity Sales on Stock Returns in Kenya: Evidence from NSE Listed Financial Institutions," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 185-190, April.
    10. Houdou Basse Mama & Stefan Mueller & Ulrich Pape, 2017. "What’s in the news? The ambiguity of the information content of index reconstitutions in Germany," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1087-1119, November.
    11. Abdul Rahman & Prabina Rajib, 2018. "Index Revisions, Stock Liquidity and the Cost of Equity Capital," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 1072-1089, August.
    12. Prabhdeep Kaur & Jaspal Singh, 2021. "Impact of ETF Listing on the Returns Generated by Underlying Stocks: Indian Evidence," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(3), pages 263-288, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:elliottvannessswalkerwarr06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Courtney Connors (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.