IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/27787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fusion of picketing, policing and public order theory within the industrial relations context of the 1992 APPM dispute at Burnie

Author

Listed:
  • Baker, D

Abstract

Policing can play a significant role in the processes, procedures and outcomes of major industrial confrontations. The 1992 APPM dispute provides the opportunity to gauge the usefulness of the ‘flashpoints’ theory during a protracted period of police and picketer cooperation that was followed by one day’s pitched battle. The decision of Justice Wright in the Tasmanian Supreme Court acted as a ‘spark’ to the bitter industrial dispute. Aspects of the ‘flashpoints’ theory can be assessed to explain why order, rather than disorder, was maintained for so long during the APPM dispute. The rapport that developed between local police and unionists was influential in avoiding violence at the picket lines. This case-study illustrates the importance of interactions between the police and the industrial protagonists in alleviating the chances of violence during volatile industrial disputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Baker, D, 2001. "The fusion of picketing, policing and public order theory within the industrial relations context of the 1992 APPM dispute at Burnie," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 27(1), pages 61-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27787
    Note: Baker, D., 2001. The fusion of picketing, policing and public order theory within the industrial relations context of the 1992 APPM dispute at Burnie. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 61-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/27787
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.