IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fis/journl/260102.html

Securitication of Taliban Within the Framework of The Copenhagen School and Analysis of The USA's De-securitization Policy (2001-2021)

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet EMİR

Abstract

The attacks that the United States was subjected to at the beginning of the new millennium and its reaction to them are still current in international relations today. Focusing on Afghanistan after the attacks, the USA described the Taliban, which is in power there, as an existential threat. The Taliban was drawn into the securitization area and the public was persuaded to launch a military operation in the region. The impact of the American intervention, which started in 2001, lasted for twenty years. The Taliban, defined as an existential threat, could not be destroyed. On the other hand, in the face of strong resistance during the process, the administration of Afghanistan was handed over to the Taliban again by following a de-securitization strategy. The main problem of the article is how the US securitization policy against the Taliban has transformed. The study examines the course of action and contradictions against the subject of an existential threat to US security. This article analyzes the discourses of the US Presidents within the framework of the Copenhagen School. It also focused on the PEW Research Center's comprehensive research on the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. After the long-term securitization struggle against the Taliban, it was concluded that this situation did not pose a vital threat when the control of the country was given back to the same actor.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet EMİR, 2026. "Securitication of Taliban Within the Framework of The Copenhagen School and Analysis of The USA's De-securitization Policy (2001-2021)," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:fis:journl:260102
    DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.1735679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/5026718
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25295/fsecon.1735679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fis:journl:260102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emre Atsan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dergipark.org.tr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.