IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fis/journl/190205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussing the Near Future of Producer Cooperative’s in Turkey while the Sugar Mill’s Privatizing: The Case of the Union of Beet Growers Cooperatives (Pankobirlik)

Author

Listed:
  • Özal ÇİÇEK, Osman Kürşat ACAR

Abstract

Pankobirlik has established in 1972 by 19 beet cooperatives and Turkey Sugar Factories Inc. Besides its services renders in harmony with agricultural production and efficiency of Turkish beet farmers, Pankobirlik aims to contribute to the development of social structure within rural areas. Pankobirlik is an organization which has approximately 1.5 million beet grower partners, sowing beet in 64 cities and 13.750 settlement units, serving with 321 outlets of 31 beet cooperatives and five sugar factories in different cities of Anatolia (Amasya, Kayseri, Boğazlıyan, Konya, and Çumra) and with over 50 agricultural shareholdings. There are 33 sugar factories in Turkey and Pankobirlik has five. Remaining three factories have owned by the private sector, and 25 factories owned by the public sector. In 2018, 14 of public sector factories have privatized almost in two months. The privatization and closure/capacity reduction process of sugar mills may turn into a reality, which threatens the existence of sugar producers, cooperatives and also their representative and senior organization of Beet Cooperatives, Pankobirlik. There are two reasons: the first reason is about the closure of sugar mills, and sales of factory sites. The second reason is the risk of capacity reduction after the privatization. Both reasons will probably to push producers to withdraw from sugar beet production, because of rising costs, mainly transportation. Because the sugar beet has to be processed right after the harvest, so the locations of sugar mills need to be close to the fields. Thus the privatization of all publicly owned factories has the potential to leave the beet producers vulnerable to the private sector’s cost minimization principle. Pankobirlik doesn’t hold a position against privatization but, it demands to transfer of operating rights (TOOR) of factories to beet producer cooperatives. In this study, we will trace essentials of a sustainable cooperative strategy (other than its current strategy), which may pursue by Pankobirlik to avoid potential negative impacts of privatizations on cooperatives and producers, via findings obtained from several in-depth interviews with Pankobirlik authorities from different levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Özal ÇİÇEK, Osman Kürşat ACAR, 2019. "Discussing the Near Future of Producer Cooperative’s in Turkey while the Sugar Mill’s Privatizing: The Case of the Union of Beet Growers Cooperatives (Pankobirlik)," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 2.
  • Handle: RePEc:fis:journl:190205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/727166
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pankobirlik; Cooperativism; Sugar Industry; Beet Producers Union; Privatization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J54 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Producer Cooperatives; Labor Managed Firms
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fis:journl:190205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emre Atsan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dergipark.gov.tr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.