Commitment versus discretion in monetary policy
Whether policymakers should commit to a certain course of action or have the flexibility to approach each situation as it arises continues to be a central question in the design of monetary policy. A seminal article written by two prominent economists in 1977 analyzed the benefits of carrying out plans based on commitment rather than discretion. Since then, others have joined the debate. In "Commitment Versus Discretion in Monetary Policy," Mike Dotsey elaborates on the merits of commitment versus discretion in setting monetary policy.
Volume (Year): (2008)
Issue (Month): Q4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1574|
Web page: http://www.philadelphiafed.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.phil.frb.org/publicaffairs/pubs/index.html Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpbr:y:2008:i:q4:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Beth Paul)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.