IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedcec/00061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Normal or Real-Time Noise? Revisiting the Recent Data on Labor Productivity

Author

Abstract

Some economic observers have argued that the weakness of recent productivity data indicates we have entered a new era of low economic growth. To investigate that claim, we study labor productivity between 1968 and 2016 and compare recent productivity growth to its past behavior. We find that though recent productivity data are unambiguously weak, they are not greatly out of line with the variation of productivity over the historical record. We find that when labor productivity has been weak in the past, it did not persist at those levels. In addition, we find a systematic tendency to understate growth in real time, suggesting that the average rate of the past six years will likely be revised up in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Bognanni & John Zito, 2016. "New Normal or Real-Time Noise? Revisiting the Recent Data on Labor Productivity," Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, issue December.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedcec:00061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2016-economic-commentaries/ec-201616-new-normal-or-real-time-noise-for-labor-productivity.aspx
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Pinheiro & Meifeng Yang, 2020. "Revisiting Wage Growth after the Recession," Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, vol. 2020(02), pages 1-5, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Growth; Productivity;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedcec:00061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: 4D Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbclus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.