IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedaer/y2005iq1p59-67nv.90no.1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quality of preventive and diagnostic medical care: why do southern states underperform?

Author

Listed:
  • Brian S. Armour
  • M. Melinda Pitts

Abstract

As the cost of health care increases rapidly, the health care industry has turned its attention to methods of cost containment. However, concern exists that the drive to contain costs could lead to compromises in the quality of medical care. One practice that may slow the growth rate of health care expenditures and improve morbidity and mortality rates is the widespread use of preventive and diagnostic services. ; Using data compiled by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, this article evaluates the quality of care received by Medicare beneficiaries in each state. The authors examine states? use of preventive services (influenza and pneumococcal immunizations) and diagnostic services (mammograms and diabetes screening tests) among Medicare beneficiaries. ; The analysis points out regional differences in preventive and diagnostic care across the United States. The West has higher levels of preventive care while the Northeast has higher scores for diagnostic care. But the South had the lowest average score for quality of care in both categories. The authors attribute differences among states? levels of preventive and diagnostic care to their socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, noting in particular that the percentage of a state?s Medicare population that is black is inversely related to the quality of medical care. ; A better understanding of the causes behind racial disparities in the quality of medical care, the authors conclude, will promote the delivery of the highest quality of care to all Medicare beneficiaries and slow the growth rate of health care costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian S. Armour & M. Melinda Pitts, 2005. "The quality of preventive and diagnostic medical care: why do southern states underperform?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 90(Q 1), pages 59-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedaer:y:2005:i:q1:p:59-67:n:v.90no.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.frbatlanta.org/-/media/documents/research/publications/economic-review/2005/vol90no1_armour-pitts.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedaer:y:2005:i:q1:p:59-67:n:v.90no.1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Meredith Rector (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbatus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.