IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/steste/vhtml10.3280-ste2010-101004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Economic Institutions, Institutional Complementarities and Institutionalized Linkages. The International Trade Case

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Mistri

Abstract

This paper analyses the forces at the base of the formation processes of international economic institutions following the fundamental New Institutional Economics (NIE) approach. In particular, the paper assumes that new international economic institutions respond to a principle of procedural rationality. This principle indicates that the formation of institutions takes place in an environment dominated by the bounded rationality of agents that produce institutions based on procedural knowledge accumulated over time. Particular attention is dedicated to the relationship between institutional innovation and economic growth. Specialized institutions stem from this relation, on par with the real economy, and generate more and more complex institutional systems. Within the institutionalist approach to the formation of institutions, the paper highlights Aoki’s concepts on "institutionalized linkages" and "institutional complementarity"; these concepts are then correlated to Schelling’s "strategy decomposition" concept; subsequently the forces that lead to institutional changes (Aoki and North) are analyzed. Specifically, in light of North’s approach, conditions are analyzed that determine changes in institutions governing international trade relations deriving from changes in some structural dimensions such as relative price systems. These changes are possible since governments can renegotiate original agreements giving rise to compensations.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Mistri, 2010. "International Economic Institutions, Institutional Complementarities and Institutionalized Linkages. The International Trade Case," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2010(101), pages 67-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2010-101004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=41682&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/inglese_download_credit.asp

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierangelo Garegnani, 2002. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 241-254, Spring.
    2. Samuel Hollander, 2000. "Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 187-232, Summer.
    3. Peach, Terry, 2001. "Hollander, de Vivo and the 'Further Evidence' for the Corn Model Interpretation of Ricardo: A Conspiracy of Silence?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(5), pages 685-692, September.
    4. P. Garegnani, 1970. "A Reply," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 439-439.
    5. Pier Luigi Porta, 1986. "Understanding the Significance of Piero Sraffa's Standard Commodity: A Note on the Marxian Notion of Surplus," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 443-454, Fall.
    6. Peach,Terry, 1993. "Interpreting Ricardo," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521260862, December.
    7. Mark Blaug, 1999. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics: The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 213-236, Summer.
    8. Hollander, Jacob H., 1904. "The Development of Ricardo's Theory of Value," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 18, pages 455-491.
    9. Peach, Terry, 1984. "David Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability: A New Interpretation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376), pages 733-751, December.
    10. Peach, Terry, 1988. "Samuel Hollander's Classical Economics: A Review Article," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 56(2), pages 167-176, June.
    11. Peach, Terry, 1998. "On Interpreting Ricardo: A Reply to Sraffians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 597-616, September.
    12. Pierangelo Garegnani, 1998. "Sraffa: the theoretical world of the 'old classical economists'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, pages 415-429.
    13. P. Garegnani, 1970. "Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 407-436.
    14. Cavalieri, Duccio, 2001. "On Some Controversial Aspects of Sraffa's Theoretical System in the Second Half of the 1920s," MPRA Paper 43737, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Cavalieri, Duccio, 1991. "Marshall, l'economia classica e la logica della separazione
      [Marshall, classical political economy and the logic of separation]
      ," MPRA Paper 44167, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Casarosa, Carlo, 1978. "A New Formulation of the Ricardian System," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 38-63, March.
    17. Hahn, Frank, 1982. "The Neo-Ricardians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 353-374, December.
    18. John Hicks & Samuel Hollander, 1977. "Mr. Ricardo and the Moderns," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 91(3), pages 351-369.
    19. Arrow, Kenneth J., 1991. "Ricardo's Work as Viewed by Later Economists," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(01), pages 70-77, June.
    20. Terry Peach, 2002. "Interpreting Ricardo: a further reply to Sraffians," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 381-391, May.
    21. Cavalieri Duccio, 2001. "Sul sistema teorico del giovane Sraffa," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 19-40.
    22. Alessandro Roncaglia & Samuel Hollander, 1982. "Hollander's Ricardo [with Reply] [with Rejoinder]," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 339-375, April.
    23. Samuelson, Paul A, 1978. "The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1415-1434, December.
    24. Christian Gehrke & Heinz D. Kurz, 2006. "Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the Classical Theory of Value and Distribution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 91-149, Spring.
    25. Garegnani, P, 1982. "On Hollander's Interpretation of Ricardo's Early Theory of Profits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 65-77, March.
    26. Pier Luigi Porta, 1986. "Understanding the Significance of Piero Sraffa's Standard Commodity: A Rejoinder," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 479-484, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2010-101004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?IDRivista=59 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.