IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/pripri/vhtml10.3280-pri2014-003006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La mancanza di corrispondenza fra consenso teorico e consenso reale: alcune possibili interpretazioni

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Andreucci

Abstract

Citizen?s opposition to fruitful industrial plant are very destabilizing and misunderstanded events for public administrators and industrial leaders, expecially when citizens are also in favour with the general way of development proposed. What this contradiction came from? For example it should came from the citizen's inability in prefiguring any industrial work before its foundation stone is placed; or from their missed involvement in public decision-making processes; or from the compresence of different point of view and different cognitive paradigms in the same community (e.g. technocratic or constructivist) for what different stakeholders hardly understand each other. In very conflictual situations, stakeholders became scepticist about the "others" actions and many bad labels are created in order to discredit the opponents, like "NIMBY" (Not In My BackYard). Even if there isn't a real conflict, the contradiction is due to the fact that many industrial plant achieve the hoped results only at a global level but in small local comunities marginality and depression still remain the same. This work is inspired by an I.S.P.R.A. (Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale) sociological research about resident opinion on wind power plant in Appennino Dauno

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Andreucci, 2014. "La mancanza di corrispondenza fra consenso teorico e consenso reale: alcune possibili interpretazioni," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 63-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:pripri:v:html10.3280/pri2014-003006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=53319&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:pripri:v:html10.3280/pri2014-003006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=156 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.