IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

„So Far and No Further!†- Thoughts on Legitimacy of the Hungarian Border Fence

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Bartko

    (Assoc. Prof. Dr., University of Győr, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Department of Criminal Sciencies)

Abstract

In 2015, Hungary was unexpectedly affected by the irregular migration flow, which marked a beginning of a new era in the history of the European migration - in terms of its quality and its size. The European countries have been forced to admit irregular migrants from the developing countries in increasing numbers. Mass migration - not only because of its irregular nature, but also because of its qualitative and quantitative changes - has created a major challenge for the authorities concerning the legal respones. In many countries, including in Hungary, the public opinion related to the irregular migration has forced the legislators to take the necessary measures against it in order to protect the public safety. In Hungary - although the irregular migration is a multifaceted phenomenon, therefore the legal respones affect many parts of the internal legal system - the law enforcement and the criminal law have been focused by the legislator. In the face of the increased migratory pressure - in order to protect the security of Hungary - the Hungarian government has accepted a package of the legal measures. The first step was the construction of the physical border fence at the Serbian-Hungarian and the Croatian-Hungarian border, and as a second stage the Hungarian Parliament adopted the Act CXL of 2015 which created the legal framework on protection of the mentioned border fence (for example creating new statutory definitions). Whereas not only the Hungarian Criminal Code, but also the Act of Criminal Procedure were amended by the mentioned act, it is necessary to deal whether the construction of the border fence can be considered as a legitimate step with special reference to the international and European commitments of Hungary. The mentioned question is considered as a preliminary one, because in default of legitimacy all of the measures adopted by the Hungarian Parliament and the Government would be considered unlawful. The paper deals with the mentioned problem and analyzes the legitimacy of the Hungarian border fence taking into consideration the international and European standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Bartko, 2020. "„So Far and No Further!†- Thoughts on Legitimacy of the Hungarian Border Fence," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, May - Aug.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:500
    DOI: 10.26417/335erv75k
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms/article/view/6131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v5_i2_20/Bartko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/335erv75k?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reus-Smit, Christian, 2017. "Cultural Diversity and International Order," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 851-885, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fues, Thomas, 2018. "Investing in the behavioural dimensions of transnational cooperation: a personal assessment of the Managing Global Governance (MGG) Programme," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.