IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/264.html

Cleanthes’ Two Illustrative Analogies in Part 3 of Hume’s Dialogues

Author

Listed:
  • Stanley Tweyman

    (York University, Toronto, Canada)

Abstract

In Part 2 of David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Cleanthes presents the analogical Argument from Design, through which he attempts to prove that there are sufficient resemblances between the design of the world and the design of machines to countenance the conclusion that the cause of the design of the world resembles human intelligence. Philo puts forth several criticisms of Cleanthes’ argument, none of which moves Cleanthes to reject the Design Argument. In Part 3, Cleanthes urges that Philo’s reluctance to accept the Design Argument is due to his prejudice against arguments supporting religion, and that, therefore, Philo’s criticisms ought to be refuted “by illustrations, examples, and instances, rather than by serious argument and philosophy†. In this regard, Cleanthes puts forth two illustrations - the Articulate Voice speaking from the clouds, and the Living Vegetable Library. In this paper, I attempt to understand why Cleanthes chooses these two illustrations to try to convince Philo of the Design Argument, and I evaluate each of these illustrations in terms of their potential to unprejudice Philo in regard to the analogical Argument from Design.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanley Tweyman, 2026. "Cleanthes’ Two Illustrative Analogies in Part 3 of Hume’s Dialogues," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:264
    DOI: 10.26417/e55gx612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejls_v12_i2_26/Tweyman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejls_v12_i2_26/Tweyman.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/e55gx612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.