IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Identity and the “Great Divide†between Two Theories. Where Does the Albanian National Identity Take Part

Author

Listed:
  • Votim Hanoli

    (Department of Communication, European University of Tirana)

Abstract

According to Tom Nairn, the reason why the dispute between modernists and primordialists is not resolved is because it is irresolvable. This is because the two approaches place different emphases on different aspects of identity formation. Nairn described the debate between Anthony Smith and Ernest Gellner, as a courteous difference of emphasis. Hence, the old presuppositions of modernism are losing their hold, but no one is quite sure what new ones will replace them. The great debate in nationalism’ studies, is one between so-called “primordialists†and “modernists†. Put simply, primordialists argue that the nation derives directly from a priori ethnic groups and is based on kinship ties and ancient heritage. For their part, modernists insist that the nation is an entirely novel form of identity and political organization, which owes nothing to ethnic heritage and everything to the modernism, and the scoope of the debate between them, fail to offer a satisfactory account of the formation of national identity. In this context we need to see where the Albanian national identity takes part. This paper seeks to show how it reacted to the waves of social transition? Where it finds itself and what connects it with globalisation?

Suggested Citation

  • Votim Hanoli, 2015. "National Identity and the “Great Divide†between Two Theories. Where Does the Albanian National Identity Take Part," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, May - Aug.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:16
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v2i1.p31-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls/article/view/5662
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v1_i2_15/Votim.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls.v2i1.p31-35?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.