IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/euf/qreuro/0172-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Second-round effects of income tax reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Janos Varga

Abstract

Fiscal policy measures have complex economic effects. Businesses and consumers may respond by changing their behaviour and these responses can themselves have further economic effects by changing the supply, demand and prices of goods and services. Quantitative assessments of these second-round budgetary effects are those with the highest degree of uncertainty and therefore often at the centre of political and public debates. Conventional budget analysis relying on static scoring assumes that GDP remains the same when the government changes taxes or spending. Although this assumption is simple and transparent, economic theory and empirical research confirm that fiscal policy influences the path of the economy. For example, if a tax cut stimulates growth, the revenue loss will be less than its estimate, assuming unaffected GDP. The macroeconomic feedback effect may not be large enough to make tax cuts pay for themselves, but it can make tax cuts partially self-financing. This section builds on a recent paper, Barrios et al. (2017), in which the authors develop a dynamic scoring framework for analysing tax and benefit reforms in European countries.(186) The framework combines EUROMOD, a static microsimulation model, with QUEST, the European Commission’s dynamic general equilibrium model. While the microsimulation model allows for the precise translation of actual tax reform proposals into policy shocks, it cannot account for the economy-wide effects of the reforms. On the other hand, dynamic general equilibrium models can consistently capture the macroeconomic feedback effects. This section shows that accounting for the macroeconomic feedback effects is important for the comprehensive evaluation of tax reforms, including their distributional impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Janos Varga, 2018. "Second-round effects of income tax reforms," Quarterly Report on the Euro Area (QREA), Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission, vol. 17(2), pages 49-61, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:euf:qreuro:0172-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2018-07/ip086_en_4_effects_income_tax_reforms.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:euf:qreuro:0172-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECFIN INFO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dg2ecbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.