IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Organización del trabajo e innovación: Un estudio comparativo entre ramas productivas argentinas

Listed author(s):
  • Analía Erbes.


    (Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento (ungs), Buenos Aires.)

  • Sonia Roitter.


    (Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento (ungs), Buenos Aires.)

  • Marcelo Delfini.


    (Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento (ungs), Buenos Aires.)

Registered author(s):

    El objetivo principal del presente artículo es analizar las características que adopta la organización del trabajo en un conjunto de empresas pertenecientes a diferentes ramas productivas argentinas y su vinculación con los procesos de innovación. Este estudio se basa en datos de una encuesta realizada a empresas de las ramas automotriz, textil, de maquinaria agrícola y siderúrgica de Argentina. Para el análisis se utilizaron dos técnicas estadísticas: análisis de cluster y modelos logit. En un contexto de fuerte predominio de formas de organización del trabajo de escasa complejidad, se concluye que las dinámicas innovativas más virtuosas prevalecen entre las empresas que se caracterizan por esquemas formativos.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México in its journal Economía: teoría y práctica..

    Volume (Year): 34 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (Enero-Junio)
    Pages: 101-138

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ety:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:101-138
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ety:journl:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:101-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Georgina Alenka Guzmán Chávez)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.