IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialbp33-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generation Z's Trust Toward Artificial Intelligence:Attitudes and Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Dewalska-Opitek
  • Olgierd Witczak
  • Agnieszka Szostak
  • Marek Dziura
  • Bozena Wroniszewska-Drabek

Abstract

Purpose: The article explores the attitudes and opinions of Generation Z (born 1995-2009) toward artificial intelligence (AI), emphasising their unique relationship with technology. Design/Methodology/Approach: The nature of the research was exploratory; three focus groups were organized, including a total of 34 participants, with each group containing between 8 and 12 individuals. The sample included both Gen Z’s males and females from various nationalities. They were either university students (Erasmus or first cycle program) or high school students (International Baccalaureate Program). Findings: The study uncovers familiarity with AI, sentiment variations, perceived benefits, and concerns Gen Z representatives. Results highlight positive sentiments about AI's potential and apprehensions about privacy and ethical challenges. Practical Implications: The results shed light on the components of Gen Z consumers' attitudes toward AI, revealing its dimensions and challenges. By addressing the perceived drawbacks and key trust issues identified by the participants, companies can better connect with this increasingly influential generation, which is drawing significant attention from researchers and practitioners and is set to become a dominant force in the future. Originality/Value: AI is quickly becoming a crucial field of scientific study, with its importance set to increase significantly in the coming years. As technological progress speeds up, AI's potential applications are expanding across various sectors. Additionally, as AI systems are more deeply integrated into daily life, thorough research is urgently needed to tackle key challenges like ethics, transparency, and bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Dewalska-Opitek & Olgierd Witczak & Agnieszka Szostak & Marek Dziura & Bozena Wroniszewska-Drabek, 2024. "Generation Z's Trust Toward Artificial Intelligence:Attitudes and Opinions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 33-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:33-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3475/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofia Samoili & Montserrat Lopez Cobo & Emilia Gomez & Giuditta De Prato & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Blagoj Delipetrev, 2020. "AI Watch. Defining Artificial Intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence," JRC Research Reports JRC118163, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hitesh Dhiman & Christoph Wächter & Michael Fellmann & Carsten Röcker, 2022. "Intelligent Assistants," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(5), pages 645-665, October.
    2. Matteo Sostero, 2020. "Automation and Robots in Services: Review of Data and Taxonomy," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2020-14, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Jiaxing Du & Han Cai & Xiu Jin, 2024. "Exploring the Association Between Artificial Intelligence Management and Green Innovation: Expanding the Research Field for Sustainable Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Emilia Gomez Gutierrez & Jose Hernandez-Orallo, 2020. "AI Watch Assessing Technology Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence," JRC Research Reports JRC122014, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Jose Hernandez-Orallo & Emilia Gomez Gutierrez, 2020. "AI Watch: Methodology to Monitor the Evolution of AI Technologies," JRC Research Reports JRC120090, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trust; artificial intelligence; Generation Z.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:33-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.